Comparison Overview

Printworx Commercial Offset Printers

VS

Travers Printing, Inc.

Printworx Commercial Offset Printers

11065 Commercial Parkway, Castroville, California, 95012, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.printworx.com

Contact Denise Cardona at 1-800-649-9287 or email: [email protected] Printworx has the largest printing and bindery capabilities of any commercial offset printer on the California central coast. Serving nationwide accounts, Printworx specializes in catalog and publication printing for the retail and wholesale industry, company sales and informational print materials, in-store point-of-purchase displays for major franchises and services the hospitality, winery, agriculture and high tech industries as well as schools and universities.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Travers Printing, Inc.

PO BOX 279, Gardner, Massachusetts, 01440, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.traversprinting.com

Travers Printing is a Solutions Based Company (SBC). We have the right combination of people and technology to give you the competitive edge today's market demands. We do more than just excel at the craft of printing, we offer fulfillment services, project management, variable data printing, eCommerce solutions, and much more. Our mission is to provide our customers with quality printing, on time, with customized services tailored to your needs. We use advanced technologies, to prepare, print, bind, personalize and ship your jobs quickly, efficiently and cost effectively. Quality, timeliness and service are the key attributes that have contributed to our continued growth and prosperity for 125 years.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printworx-commercial-offset-printers.jpeg
Printworx Commercial Offset Printers
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/travers-printing-inc..jpeg
Travers Printing, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Printworx Commercial Offset Printers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Travers Printing, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Printworx Commercial Offset Printers in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Travers Printing, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Printworx Commercial Offset Printers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Printworx Commercial Offset Printers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Travers Printing, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Travers Printing, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printworx-commercial-offset-printers.jpeg
Printworx Commercial Offset Printers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/travers-printing-inc..jpeg
Travers Printing, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Printworx Commercial Offset Printers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Travers Printing, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Travers Printing, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Printworx Commercial Offset Printers company.

In the current year, Travers Printing, Inc. company and Printworx Commercial Offset Printers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Travers Printing, Inc. company nor Printworx Commercial Offset Printers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Travers Printing, Inc. company nor Printworx Commercial Offset Printers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Travers Printing, Inc. company nor Printworx Commercial Offset Printers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Printworx Commercial Offset Printers company nor Travers Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Printworx Commercial Offset Printers nor Travers Printing, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Printworx Commercial Offset Printers company nor Travers Printing, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Printworx Commercial Offset Printers company employs more people globally than Travers Printing, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Printworx Commercial Offset Printers nor Travers Printing, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Printworx Commercial Offset Printers nor Travers Printing, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Printworx Commercial Offset Printers nor Travers Printing, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Printworx Commercial Offset Printers nor Travers Printing, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Printworx Commercial Offset Printers nor Travers Printing, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Printworx Commercial Offset Printers nor Travers Printing, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References