Comparison Overview

PrintPack

VS

Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print

PrintPack

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.print-pack.net

Imagine with one click, you can easily find all what you need from printing to packing with reasonable prices and perfect quality. What you only have to do is selecting your order, choosing the quatity and send your design, then your order will be in hands. If you want to regularly get specific products with specified design, you can subscribe and get discounts and your ordered items will be delivered on time.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print

Jl. Puspa Raya No.11, Bekasi, 17550, ID
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kimlu.com

KIMLU didirikan pada tahun 1999 oleh entrepreneur dengan pengetahuan dan pengalaman lebih dari 20 tahun. Dimulai dengan cetak offset dan layanan sablon di Cikarang, Bekasi yang tumbuh pesat dengan pertumbuhan beberapa daerah industri. Saat ini KIMLU menyediakan layanan lengkap dari produk konvensional pencetakan mulai dari Kop surat, Amplop, Kartu Nama, Formulir, Faktur Pajak, Brosur, Sticker, Continuous forms, Poster, Agenda, Kalender, Buku pelajaran, Buku manual sampai pencetakan digital untuk Banner, X Banner, Roll Banner, Backdrop, Peta dan Poster digital. Selain itu KIMLU juga menyediakan stempel biasa dan stempel warna, kartu ID, Kartu Diskon, Kartu Member, Pin/button badge dll. KIMLU juga menyediakan layanan untuk pembuatan Neonbox, display akrilik, display akrilik dengan LED, layar LED bergerak, sign 3D, sign 3D dengan animasi LED. Untuk industri yang mempunyai bagian sablon, KIMLU menyediakan layanan untuk pembuatan stensil sablon, pembuatan film dan semua bahan pendukung untuk sablon.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 78
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printpack.jpeg
PrintPack
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kimlu-percetakan-dan-digital-print.jpeg
Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PrintPack
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PrintPack in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print in 2025.

Incident History — PrintPack (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PrintPack cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printpack.jpeg
PrintPack
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kimlu-percetakan-dan-digital-print.jpeg
Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PrintPack company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PrintPack company.

In the current year, Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print company and PrintPack company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print company nor PrintPack company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print company nor PrintPack company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print company nor PrintPack company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PrintPack company nor Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PrintPack nor Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PrintPack company nor Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print company employs more people globally than PrintPack company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither PrintPack nor Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PrintPack nor Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PrintPack nor Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PrintPack nor Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PrintPack nor Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PrintPack nor Kimlu Percetakan dan Digital Print holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References