Comparison Overview

Printing Palace, Inc.

VS

TPM Graphics, Inc.

Printing Palace, Inc.

2300 Lincoln Blvd., Santa Monica, California, 90405, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Printing Palace is located in Santa Monica, California and is owned and operated by Eli Albek. Printing Palace has been serving Santa Monica and the surrounding Los Angeles area for 28 years. It has grown into a complete communication company, helping business and institutions with their marketing, promotional, communications and complete printing needs. Additionally, we offer our clients competitive pricing, for top quality work, that's guaranteed to meet their satisfaction. Currently we occupy an 7,000 square foot facility that includes a complete Pre-Press Department with a Graphic Artist to start your project off right. The Press and Bindery Department will complete your project and give you the edge you need to stand out and be noticed. If you have any questions; our fast and friendly customer service staff will be here to answer and assist you with all your needs. In October 2009, Printing Palace implemented an online ordering system. You can view this system by visiting https://online.printingpalace.com

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TPM Graphics, Inc.

645 W. University Drive, Arlington Heights, IL, 60004, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

TPM Graphics, Inc. is a commercial printing company founded in 1985. The principals have been actively involved in growing the business into a full service printing and bindery company. Both offset printing, up to 6 color, and digital printing are utilized to bring the highest quality product for the best price. Incorporating aqueous coating improves turnaround, and having multiple forms of booklet making allows more autonomy. One of the newer additions, an environmentally conscious, chem-free, plate-making system has improved quality as well as conditions. Recently, a new digital press was added to the mix. As a result of a collaboration between Ricoh and Heidelberg, the Linoprint C901 has become the go-to machine for short-run, economical products. TPM is using the benefits of variable data, as well as static printing to produce high-quality prints from our digital department. With the industry leading, Heidelberg equipment, from front to back, the shop is operating at maximum efficiency on multiple shifts. The long-term staff and proven track record has provided customers with confidence that jobs get done right the first time.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printing-palace-inc..jpeg
Printing Palace, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tpm-graphics-inc-.jpeg
TPM Graphics, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Printing Palace, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TPM Graphics, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Printing Palace, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TPM Graphics, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Printing Palace, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Printing Palace, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TPM Graphics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TPM Graphics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printing-palace-inc..jpeg
Printing Palace, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tpm-graphics-inc-.jpeg
TPM Graphics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Printing Palace, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TPM Graphics, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, TPM Graphics, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Printing Palace, Inc. company.

In the current year, TPM Graphics, Inc. company and Printing Palace, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TPM Graphics, Inc. company nor Printing Palace, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TPM Graphics, Inc. company nor Printing Palace, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TPM Graphics, Inc. company nor Printing Palace, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. company nor TPM Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. nor TPM Graphics, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. company nor TPM Graphics, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

TPM Graphics, Inc. company employs more people globally than Printing Palace, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. nor TPM Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. nor TPM Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. nor TPM Graphics, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. nor TPM Graphics, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. nor TPM Graphics, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. nor TPM Graphics, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L