Comparison Overview

Printing Palace, Inc.

VS

Robin Printing & Packages Ltd.

Printing Palace, Inc.

2300 Lincoln Blvd., Santa Monica, California, 90405, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Printing Palace is located in Santa Monica, California and is owned and operated by Eli Albek. Printing Palace has been serving Santa Monica and the surrounding Los Angeles area for 28 years. It has grown into a complete communication company, helping business and institutions with their marketing, promotional, communications and complete printing needs. Additionally, we offer our clients competitive pricing, for top quality work, that's guaranteed to meet their satisfaction. Currently we occupy an 7,000 square foot facility that includes a complete Pre-Press Department with a Graphic Artist to start your project off right. The Press and Bindery Department will complete your project and give you the edge you need to stand out and be noticed. If you have any questions; our fast and friendly customer service staff will be here to answer and assist you with all your needs. In October 2009, Printing Palace implemented an online ordering system. You can view this system by visiting https://online.printingpalace.com

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Robin Printing & Packages Ltd.

Purana Paltan, Dhaka, BD
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Robin Printing & Packages Ltd, established in the mid sixties, now offers a wide range of services – focusing on the printing & packaging of cigarette cartons for British American Tobacco (BAT) Bangladesh, it also caters to the various printing requirements of major Multinational Companies, Local Banks, International Agencies and notable Corporate Houses. Our initial plant investment at Tongi, Gazipur started off by focusing on Letterpress and with time shifting to Offset Lithography and eventually to Gravure technology to ensure quality and offer true operational flexibility. Due to increased capacity and customer requirement of a contingency plan, Robin has invested in setting up a second unit at Joydevpur, Gazipur. The benefits of having two units enabled us to have two state of the art Roto-Gravure Machines under one unit and Offset capability at completely in a different unit thus deploying proper adequate resources to ensure absolute capability to supply risk free materials to our valued customers. Robin has been a major player in Paper & Board printing for British American Tobacco; the Gravure printed products include Star, Benson & Hedges, Gold Leaf, Pall Mall, Capstan, Scissors, Pilot, Derby, Hollywood, Kings etc. With a current volume of around 150 million packs a month both under Gravure and Offset process, and with one of the biggest Offset unit in Bangladesh, the company has also strengthened its foothold into Flexible Materials division since May 2013 with a current capacity of being able to produce 350 tons a month. The flexible division currently produces food packaging, detergent packs, tea pouches, pharmaceutical foils, pesticides & insecticides, toiletries packaging, beverage labels etc and hence we have invested latest project consists of the state-of-the-art machineries with the printing unit manufactured by Bobst Rotomec Italia, which also happens to be the first of its kind in Bangladesh with the Electronic Line Shaft technology.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 106
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printing-palace-inc..jpeg
Printing Palace, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robinpp.jpeg
Robin Printing & Packages Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Printing Palace, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Robin Printing & Packages Ltd.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Printing Palace, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Robin Printing & Packages Ltd. in 2025.

Incident History — Printing Palace, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Printing Palace, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Robin Printing & Packages Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Robin Printing & Packages Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printing-palace-inc..jpeg
Printing Palace, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robinpp.jpeg
Robin Printing & Packages Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Printing Palace, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Robin Printing & Packages Ltd. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Robin Printing & Packages Ltd. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Printing Palace, Inc. company.

In the current year, Robin Printing & Packages Ltd. company and Printing Palace, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Robin Printing & Packages Ltd. company nor Printing Palace, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Robin Printing & Packages Ltd. company nor Printing Palace, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Robin Printing & Packages Ltd. company nor Printing Palace, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. company nor Robin Printing & Packages Ltd. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. nor Robin Printing & Packages Ltd. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. company nor Robin Printing & Packages Ltd. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Robin Printing & Packages Ltd. company employs more people globally than Printing Palace, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. nor Robin Printing & Packages Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. nor Robin Printing & Packages Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. nor Robin Printing & Packages Ltd. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. nor Robin Printing & Packages Ltd. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. nor Robin Printing & Packages Ltd. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. nor Robin Printing & Packages Ltd. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L