Comparison Overview

Printing Palace, Inc.

VS

Allprint Graphics

Printing Palace, Inc.

2300 Lincoln Blvd., Santa Monica, California, 90405, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Printing Palace is located in Santa Monica, California and is owned and operated by Eli Albek. Printing Palace has been serving Santa Monica and the surrounding Los Angeles area for 28 years. It has grown into a complete communication company, helping business and institutions with their marketing, promotional, communications and complete printing needs. Additionally, we offer our clients competitive pricing, for top quality work, that's guaranteed to meet their satisfaction. Currently we occupy an 7,000 square foot facility that includes a complete Pre-Press Department with a Graphic Artist to start your project off right. The Press and Bindery Department will complete your project and give you the edge you need to stand out and be noticed. If you have any questions; our fast and friendly customer service staff will be here to answer and assist you with all your needs. In October 2009, Printing Palace implemented an online ordering system. You can view this system by visiting https://online.printingpalace.com

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Allprint Graphics

14 Pike St, Rydalmere, 2116, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Having designed and produced Point of Purchase material for over 60 years means Allprint Graphics has a wealth of knowledge to share and benefit our clients. We provide innovative, quality printed Graphics Communications, using the latest technologies, with service that will exceed your expectations. One point of contact for a large range of printed Point of Purchase material – from one-off customised digital prints, right through to many thousands of brochures. This saves you time and money coordinating various suppliers, and makes ordering POP trouble free. Outstanding Service – being a family run business employing over 30 staff and a strong enthusiastic management team, we can guarantee your phone calls and emails will be promptly acted on, you will be kept informed as to work in progress and we will go out of our way to assist our valued clients however possible. We produce almost all our jobs completely in-house – as we control the entire job, your POP items will all be of superior quality, matched for colour and will be delivered on time. Environmentally aware business utilising extensive recycling of waste and continually assessing new environmentally friendly products. Access to new POP ideas and solutions – we are continually assessing new materials and technologies to provide innovative POP solutions for our clients. A long and successful track record – we have been in the Visual Communications business for over 60 years with some of our clients being with us for 30 of those years. During this time we have continued to evolve, keeping up to date in equipment and techniques, which means our clients get the best product possible.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printing-palace-inc..jpeg
Printing Palace, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allprint-graphics.jpeg
Allprint Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Printing Palace, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Allprint Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Printing Palace, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allprint Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Printing Palace, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Printing Palace, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Allprint Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allprint Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printing-palace-inc..jpeg
Printing Palace, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allprint-graphics.jpeg
Allprint Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Printing Palace, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Allprint Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Allprint Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Printing Palace, Inc. company.

In the current year, Allprint Graphics company and Printing Palace, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Allprint Graphics company nor Printing Palace, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Allprint Graphics company nor Printing Palace, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Allprint Graphics company nor Printing Palace, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. company nor Allprint Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. nor Allprint Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. company nor Allprint Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Allprint Graphics company employs more people globally than Printing Palace, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. nor Allprint Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. nor Allprint Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. nor Allprint Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. nor Allprint Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. nor Allprint Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Printing Palace, Inc. nor Allprint Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L