Comparison Overview

Printing Express

VS

Best Label Company, Inc.

Printing Express

521 N Mur-Len, Olathe, KS, 66062, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Printing Express is a full-service commercial printing company, providing in-house print services since 1990. We are strategically located in the Kansas City area, allowing us to deliver print services nationwide with ease. What started as a small, offset-driven shop has grown into a full-service Print Service Provider utilizing a hybrid of digital and offset printing technology. While our low overhead allows us to be extremely competitive on short runs, our high efficiency allows us to be equally competitive on larger jobs. Our wide-format equipment allows us to produce both indoor and outdoor signange as well as photo lab-quality photographs, and our large-format photo and print work speaks for itself. When you're in the market for Quality Printing at Reasonable Prices, it's time to experience Printing Express.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Best Label Company, Inc.

13260 Moore Street, Cerritos, CA 90703, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Best Label prints labels and tags for multiple different industries. Food & Beverage, Health & Beauty, Pharmaceutical, Nutraceutical, Agriculture, Marketing Collateral, Direct Mail & Forms. They print using the latest flexographic high definition plates have many different print methods including rotary letterpress, silkscreen and inline rotary foil stamping. ISO:9001 and FIRST Company Certified.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printing-express.jpeg
Printing Express
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/best-label-company-inc-.jpeg
Best Label Company, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Printing Express
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Best Label Company, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Printing Express in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Best Label Company, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Printing Express (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Printing Express cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Best Label Company, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Best Label Company, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printing-express.jpeg
Printing Express
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/best-label-company-inc-.jpeg
Best Label Company, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Printing Express company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Best Label Company, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Best Label Company, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Printing Express company.

In the current year, Best Label Company, Inc. company and Printing Express company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Best Label Company, Inc. company nor Printing Express company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Best Label Company, Inc. company nor Printing Express company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Best Label Company, Inc. company nor Printing Express company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Printing Express company nor Best Label Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Printing Express nor Best Label Company, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Printing Express company nor Best Label Company, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Best Label Company, Inc. company employs more people globally than Printing Express company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Printing Express nor Best Label Company, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Printing Express nor Best Label Company, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Printing Express nor Best Label Company, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Printing Express nor Best Label Company, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Printing Express nor Best Label Company, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Printing Express nor Best Label Company, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N