Comparison Overview

PrintGraphics, Inc.

VS

BCM Inks

PrintGraphics, Inc.

359 Salem Street, Wakefield, MA, 01880, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pgiprinting.com

At PrintGraphics, we specialize in medium to short-run digital printing, delivering exceptional quality and service from our location in Wakefield, Massachusetts, just 15 miles north of Boston. Our commitment to fast turnaround means most jobs ship within 2–3 business days, and we offer next-day service on many orders. We pride ourselves on providing the highest-quality digital printing and finishing services in the industry. To showcase our excellence, we offer free production proofs on most products. Explore our extensive product offerings on pgiprinting.com. Many of our products feature a price match option—if you find a lower price online, simply provide the details, and we’ll strive to match or beat it. Our team is dedicated to making your experience seamless. All of our customer service representatives are also skilled graphic designers, ready to adjust your files or create new designs tailored to your needs. For added convenience, we provide VIP websites for our clients, featuring personalized ordering options and templates for your most frequently ordered items, including business cards, postcards, and more. Experience the difference with PrintGraphics—where quality meets convenience, and your satisfaction is our priority.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

BCM Inks

161 Commerce Blvd, Loveland, Ohio, 45242, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bcminks.com

Since its inception in the United States in 1988, BCM Inks has been committed to improving the corrugated industry’s direct print capabilities through innovative and environmentally sensitive products, superior technical expertise, and technological advancement. BCM Inks works closely with educators and industry to further the advancement of value-added corrugated postprint. BCM Inks has achieved ISO 9001/2015 certification, is a Sony “Green Partner”, and is an innovator in the development of enhanced ink blending/color management systems.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printgraphics-inc-.jpeg
PrintGraphics, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bcm-inks.jpeg
BCM Inks
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PrintGraphics, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BCM Inks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PrintGraphics, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BCM Inks in 2025.

Incident History — PrintGraphics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PrintGraphics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BCM Inks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BCM Inks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printgraphics-inc-.jpeg
PrintGraphics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bcm-inks.jpeg
BCM Inks
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PrintGraphics, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BCM Inks company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BCM Inks company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PrintGraphics, Inc. company.

In the current year, BCM Inks company and PrintGraphics, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BCM Inks company nor PrintGraphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BCM Inks company nor PrintGraphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BCM Inks company nor PrintGraphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PrintGraphics, Inc. company nor BCM Inks company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PrintGraphics, Inc. nor BCM Inks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PrintGraphics, Inc. company nor BCM Inks company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

BCM Inks company employs more people globally than PrintGraphics, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither PrintGraphics, Inc. nor BCM Inks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PrintGraphics, Inc. nor BCM Inks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PrintGraphics, Inc. nor BCM Inks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PrintGraphics, Inc. nor BCM Inks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PrintGraphics, Inc. nor BCM Inks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PrintGraphics, Inc. nor BCM Inks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References