Comparison Overview

Fidelity Offset, Inc.

VS

Leleu printing

Fidelity Offset, Inc.

Nashville, Tennessee, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

In 1999, we were founded with one goal – to create value for our clients by creating colorful communications that connect brands with consumers across North America. Over the past two decades, we’ve grown scalable distribution and logistics networks throughout the United States to ensure more than just ink runs through our veins. Proudly, we remain committed to extending our reach, providing clients with free branded online storefronts to reduce the burden of managing branded assets, inventory, and ordering prints with real-time shipping estimates. For a closer look at our full range of services, including graphic design, printing, warehousing, distribution, and direct mail solutions, please call our friendly team at (615) 244-9200 or check out our website at www.printfidelity.com.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Leleu printing

Dorpstraat 85, Brussegem, BE, 1785
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Leleu started in 1936 as a traditional printer. Nowadays Leleu is a full service printer with a wide range of solutions for printing, mailings, invoice fulfilment,... and this all in-house. Leleu can offer a total solution to the customer and is proud of his engagement towards the environment and his continuous investments in human resources and new machinery. Leleu has a solid position on the market, national and international. Leleu also offers IT-solutions tailored to the customer to simplify life for the customer, also these services does Leleu in-house.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printfidelity.jpeg
Fidelity Offset, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leleu-printing.jpeg
Leleu printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fidelity Offset, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Leleu printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fidelity Offset, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Leleu printing in 2025.

Incident History — Fidelity Offset, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fidelity Offset, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Leleu printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Leleu printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printfidelity.jpeg
Fidelity Offset, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leleu-printing.jpeg
Leleu printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Leleu printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fidelity Offset, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Leleu printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fidelity Offset, Inc. company.

In the current year, Leleu printing company and Fidelity Offset, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Leleu printing company nor Fidelity Offset, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Leleu printing company nor Fidelity Offset, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Leleu printing company nor Fidelity Offset, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fidelity Offset, Inc. company nor Leleu printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fidelity Offset, Inc. nor Leleu printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fidelity Offset, Inc. company nor Leleu printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fidelity Offset, Inc. company employs more people globally than Leleu printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Fidelity Offset, Inc. nor Leleu printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fidelity Offset, Inc. nor Leleu printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fidelity Offset, Inc. nor Leleu printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fidelity Offset, Inc. nor Leleu printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fidelity Offset, Inc. nor Leleu printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fidelity Offset, Inc. nor Leleu printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N