Comparison Overview

Fidelity Offset, Inc.

VS

Industrial Labeling Systems Corp.

Fidelity Offset, Inc.

Nashville, Tennessee, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

In 1999, we were founded with one goal – to create value for our clients by creating colorful communications that connect brands with consumers across North America. Over the past two decades, we’ve grown scalable distribution and logistics networks throughout the United States to ensure more than just ink runs through our veins. Proudly, we remain committed to extending our reach, providing clients with free branded online storefronts to reduce the burden of managing branded assets, inventory, and ordering prints with real-time shipping estimates. For a closer look at our full range of services, including graphic design, printing, warehousing, distribution, and direct mail solutions, please call our friendly team at (615) 244-9200 or check out our website at www.printfidelity.com.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Industrial Labeling Systems Corp.

100 Business Park Dr, Tyngsboro, Massachusetts, 01879, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Celebrating over 25 years in business, Industrial Labeling Systems, Corp is a global, industry-leading label manufacturer located in Tyngsboro, MA. We proudly offer a mature product portfolio that has been successful in every major market today. Our state of the art printing technologies and team of dedicated labeling application specialists will help you solve your identification needs under any conditions and in any environments. In today’s age of competitive marketing, automation, lean manufacturing and regulatory compliance, labeling your product is inevitable; stressing about it is optional. Call or email Industrial Labeling Systems today and let us help you reduce your TO DO list one label application at a time!!! www.ils-barcode.com 978-649-7004

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printfidelity.jpeg
Fidelity Offset, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/industrial-labeling-systems-corp.jpeg
Industrial Labeling Systems Corp.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fidelity Offset, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Industrial Labeling Systems Corp.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fidelity Offset, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Industrial Labeling Systems Corp. in 2025.

Incident History — Fidelity Offset, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fidelity Offset, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Industrial Labeling Systems Corp. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Industrial Labeling Systems Corp. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printfidelity.jpeg
Fidelity Offset, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/industrial-labeling-systems-corp.jpeg
Industrial Labeling Systems Corp.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Industrial Labeling Systems Corp. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fidelity Offset, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Industrial Labeling Systems Corp. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fidelity Offset, Inc. company.

In the current year, Industrial Labeling Systems Corp. company and Fidelity Offset, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Industrial Labeling Systems Corp. company nor Fidelity Offset, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Industrial Labeling Systems Corp. company nor Fidelity Offset, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Industrial Labeling Systems Corp. company nor Fidelity Offset, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fidelity Offset, Inc. company nor Industrial Labeling Systems Corp. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fidelity Offset, Inc. nor Industrial Labeling Systems Corp. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fidelity Offset, Inc. company nor Industrial Labeling Systems Corp. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fidelity Offset, Inc. company employs more people globally than Industrial Labeling Systems Corp. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Fidelity Offset, Inc. nor Industrial Labeling Systems Corp. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fidelity Offset, Inc. nor Industrial Labeling Systems Corp. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fidelity Offset, Inc. nor Industrial Labeling Systems Corp. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fidelity Offset, Inc. nor Industrial Labeling Systems Corp. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fidelity Offset, Inc. nor Industrial Labeling Systems Corp. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fidelity Offset, Inc. nor Industrial Labeling Systems Corp. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N