Comparison Overview

Printex

VS

Admark Graphics

Printex

4D Gill Street, Woburn, MA, 01801, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Established: September 19, 1994 The Printex objective is to uphold a reputation of efficiency and guaranteed customer satisfaction. In order to achieve this goal, Printex has dedicated itself to a philosophy of loyalty, not only to our customers, but also to our manufacturers. The partnership we share with our vendors creates a high level of consistency and ensures competitive pricing. We are a Brand Management company servicing a number of industries and businesses world-wide. Our products can be classified in three major categories; Promotional Items (Trade Show Items and Executive Gifts), Wearables (Silk-Screening and Embroidery) and Print (Marketing Materials). This diversification of product mix allows us to service our customers many needs while maintaining the integrity of their brand. Printex balances great service and attentive communication with the need for technology and innovative solutions to meet our customer’s demands. Our customized e-commerce capabilities give our clients the ability to design their own online ordering system. This system allows the client to place orders, receive the appropriate reporting and store merchandise which needs to be picked, packed and distributed. We provide a single source solution for all of your branding needs. Please allow us to be your preferred vendor for great products and efficient and effective service.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 178
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Admark Graphics

9700 Metromont Industrial Blvd, Charlotte, 28269, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10

Founded in 1981, Admark has made the quantum leap from a local manufacturer of basic truck decals to a custom, high-end graphic design and commercial four-color process, digital & screen printing company capable of printing on almost any substrate. Admark has emerged as one of the industry leaders in fleet graphics and a strong contender in the Original Equipment Manufacturer's (OEM) and Point of Purchase (POP) graphics. Complimenting Admark's printing ability, we also have expert application teams that can install graphics all over the country for our customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printex.jpeg
Printex
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/admark-graphic-systems.jpeg
Admark Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Printex
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Admark Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Printex in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Admark Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Printex (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Printex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Admark Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Admark Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printex.jpeg
Printex
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/admark-graphic-systems.jpeg
Admark Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Printex company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Admark Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Admark Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Printex company.

In the current year, Admark Graphics company and Printex company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Admark Graphics company nor Printex company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Admark Graphics company nor Printex company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Admark Graphics company nor Printex company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Printex company nor Admark Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Printex nor Admark Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Printex company nor Admark Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Printex company employs more people globally than Admark Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Printex nor Admark Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Printex nor Admark Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Printex nor Admark Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Printex nor Admark Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Printex nor Admark Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Printex nor Admark Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N