Comparison Overview

Printers Square, Inc.

VS

Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd.

Printers Square, Inc.

105 Faltin Drive, Manchester, 03103, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.psquare.com

Commercial printing company with focus in digital printing, transpromo and variable data campaign printing. As a commercial print firm, Printers Square offers the latest in today's print technologies combining both online and offline campaigns for greater results. A complete range of services including print, fulfillment, mailing, email, and much more are available.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd.

Varey Road, Congleton, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.finedecor.com/

Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd are manufacturers of high quality wallcoverings based in the heart of Cheshire, England, in the Town of Congleton. Our factory includes a team of skilled designers, colourists and printers, an experienced sampling team and product development specialists working together, with a variety of new substrates and techniques to ensure that we produce the most beautiful and cutting edge designs in the market. Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd is a family owned 5th generation business, employing 120 employees at our site in Congleton. These employees bring a wealth of knowledge with some having over 40 years’ experience developing their craft. We have a truly diverse portfolio of projects and are proud to produce wallpaper, stickers and borders for any of today’s household names. We are one of the oldest wallcovering establishments in the UK and through continuous innovation and passion, we have established a heritage brand.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 72
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Printers Square, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fine-decor.jpeg
Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Printers Square, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Printers Square, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. in 2025.

Incident History — Printers Square, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Printers Square, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Printers Square, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fine-decor.jpeg
Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Printers Square, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Printers Square, Inc. company.

In the current year, Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. company and Printers Square, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. company nor Printers Square, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. company nor Printers Square, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. company nor Printers Square, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Printers Square, Inc. company nor Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Printers Square, Inc. nor Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Printers Square, Inc. company nor Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. company employs more people globally than Printers Square, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Printers Square, Inc. nor Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Printers Square, Inc. nor Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Printers Square, Inc. nor Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Printers Square, Inc. nor Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Printers Square, Inc. nor Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Printers Square, Inc. nor Fine Decor Wallcoverings Ltd. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References