Comparison Overview

Print NW

VS

Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company

Print NW

9914 32nd Ave S, Lakewood, WA, 98499, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.printnw.net/

About Us PRINT NW is a locally owned and operated, full-service printing company. With a 40,000 square foot production facility operating 24 hours a day, we have the backend production capacity to handle any volume: large or small. Best Service Each customer is assigned your own dedicated customer service representative and sales executive, ready to assist you through all phases of the design, production, shipment, and installation process. Best Value Our new, convenient bizz-hub locations are your one-stop solution for all of your printing and marketing needs. We have hundreds of product solutions at the most cost effective pricing to meet your budget. Grow Your Business From small quantities to large runs and fast turnaround times, we are here to help you leverage today’s technologies to help you grow your business and increase your ROI. Check out our company video! https://vimeo.com/151409846

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 84
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company

2643 W Chicago Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60622, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.andresimaging.com

Andres Imaging & Graphics brings a wealth of creative expertise and field experience to graphic branded environments. Andres has a long history in complete customer satisfaction in the Retail, Corporate, Museum, Exhibit, Event, and Hospitality markets. Our continued goal is to understand your business and to transform your environment into an integrated and engaging brand experience.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/print-nw.jpeg
Print NW
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/andres-imaging-&-graphics.jpeg
Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Print NW
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Print NW in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company in 2025.

Incident History — Print NW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Print NW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/print-nw.jpeg
Print NW
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/andres-imaging-&-graphics.jpeg
Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Print NW company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Print NW company.

In the current year, Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company company and Print NW company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company company nor Print NW company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company company nor Print NW company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company company nor Print NW company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Print NW company nor Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Print NW nor Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Print NW company nor Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Print NW company employs more people globally than Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Print NW nor Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Print NW nor Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Print NW nor Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Print NW nor Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Print NW nor Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Print NW nor Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References