Comparison Overview

Princeton Legal Journal

VS

WKU Talisman

Princeton Legal Journal

Princeton, 08544, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Princeton Legal Journal (PLJ )is Princeton’s only undergraduate law review. We are entirely student-run, and we hope to provide a meaningful, impactful, and lasting space for legal discourse on campus. The Journal consists of two sections: the Forum and the Review. The Forum consists of short-form legal content while the Review consists of full-length journal articles that dive in-depth into legal issues spanning multiple subjects. The opinions expressed by the writers do not reflect those of the Editorial and Executive Boards of the PLJ.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

WKU Talisman

1906 College Heights Blvd. #11084, Bowling Green, 42101, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

The Talisman is the official lifestyle magazine of Western Kentucky University and was founded in 1924. In 2017 the Talisman topped producing yearbooks and became a campus lifestyle magazine that strives to tell the stories that are unique and interesting, for students, staff, and community members alike. The Talisman breaks through the mold of regular lifestyle magazines and strives to capture the unique essence of each semester through award-winning photography combined with equally impressive written stories and design. The Talisman staff publish web stories on a daily basis and promote them on our social media platforms. Our magazine is launched quarterly after our dedicated staffers create their vision for our magazine based on that semester's theme. Four magazines have been published so far and we continue to publish a magazine at the end of each semester. Our previous themes have included, Identity, Well Being, and Power. Our student-run publication is looked to as a model by many universities and is consistently given high praise and awards at the national level. The following awards received by the book do not include the many individual awards that staff members have won. 14 Pacemakers 5 Gold Crowns 4 Silver Crowns 5 Trendsetters Within the magazine, the Talisman captures the spirit here at Western Kentucky University and throughout the Bowling Green community. Working for the Talisman has several advantages. Talisman staffers develop skills in a workplace environment that mirrors a professional publication. Staffers also form lasting bonds and friendships with their fellow co-workers. The Talisman offers positions in photography, writing, marketing, layout and design. Follow us on social media at: Twitter: @wkutalisman Facebook:@WKUTalisman Instagram: @wkutalisman

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wku-talisman.jpeg
WKU Talisman
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Princeton Legal Journal
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
WKU Talisman
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Princeton Legal Journal in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WKU Talisman in 2025.

Incident History — Princeton Legal Journal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Princeton Legal Journal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — WKU Talisman (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WKU Talisman cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/princeton-legal-journal.jpeg
Princeton Legal Journal
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wku-talisman.jpeg
WKU Talisman
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Princeton Legal Journal company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to WKU Talisman company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, WKU Talisman company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Princeton Legal Journal company.

In the current year, WKU Talisman company and Princeton Legal Journal company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither WKU Talisman company nor Princeton Legal Journal company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither WKU Talisman company nor Princeton Legal Journal company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither WKU Talisman company nor Princeton Legal Journal company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Princeton Legal Journal company nor WKU Talisman company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Princeton Legal Journal nor WKU Talisman holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Princeton Legal Journal company nor WKU Talisman company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

WKU Talisman company employs more people globally than Princeton Legal Journal company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Princeton Legal Journal nor WKU Talisman holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Princeton Legal Journal nor WKU Talisman holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Princeton Legal Journal nor WKU Talisman holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Princeton Legal Journal nor WKU Talisman holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Princeton Legal Journal nor WKU Talisman holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Princeton Legal Journal nor WKU Talisman holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.