Comparison Overview

Pride Media Inc.

VS

We are Paperjam

Pride Media Inc.

PO BOX 241579, Los Angeles, California, 90024, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Pride Media operates the most established, most recognized, and most talked-about media brands serving the LGBTQ market. Our award-winning content is delivered within a dynamic portfolio of media properties that are rich in history, culture, news, entertainment, fashion, and photography. Together, these properties capture the many facets of the LGBTQ experience and reach millions of readers and viewers every month. Across all platforms—print, video, online, social media, tablet, events and mobile—Pride Media reaches consumers wherever they are and however they want.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

We are Paperjam

10 rue des Gaulois, Luxembourg, 1618, LU
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Paperjam is Luxembourg’s leading independent publishing company. Founded in 1994, the company has diversified thanks to an ambitious development strategy supported by more than 120 passionated collaborators. Divided into three business units, its activities include a publishing house, a brand studio specialised in content marketing and native advertising, and a business club. Focused on its readers, members and clients, the company proposes a bilingual offer in English and French. Maison Moderne [now Paperjam] is leading media brands include Delano and Paperjam, Delano. it's a partnership formed by Mike Koedinger (the company’s founder), Etienne Velasti and Francis Gasparotto. With the formula “Challenger today, leader tomorrow”, the company is committed to Luxembourg’s long-term development and contributes to societal change by accompanying all political, social and cultural development in a constructively critical manner.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 138
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pride-media-inc.jpeg
Pride Media Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maison-moderne.jpeg
We are Paperjam
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pride Media Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
We are Paperjam
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pride Media Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for We are Paperjam in 2025.

Incident History — Pride Media Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pride Media Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — We are Paperjam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

We are Paperjam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pride-media-inc.jpeg
Pride Media Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maison-moderne.jpeg
We are Paperjam
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

We are Paperjam company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pride Media Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, We are Paperjam company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pride Media Inc. company.

In the current year, We are Paperjam company and Pride Media Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither We are Paperjam company nor Pride Media Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither We are Paperjam company nor Pride Media Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither We are Paperjam company nor Pride Media Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pride Media Inc. company nor We are Paperjam company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pride Media Inc. nor We are Paperjam holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

We are Paperjam company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Pride Media Inc. company.

We are Paperjam company employs more people globally than Pride Media Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Pride Media Inc. nor We are Paperjam holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pride Media Inc. nor We are Paperjam holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pride Media Inc. nor We are Paperjam holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pride Media Inc. nor We are Paperjam holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pride Media Inc. nor We are Paperjam holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pride Media Inc. nor We are Paperjam holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.