Precision Imaging Centers Breach Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PRE3003030111125)

The Rankiteo video explains how the company Precision Imaging Centers has been impacted by a Breach on the date November 02, 2022.

newsone

Incident Summary

Rankiteo Incident Impact
-64
Company Score Before Incident
762 / 1000
Company Score After Incident
698 / 1000
Company Link
Incident ID
PRE3003030111125
Type of Cyber Incident
Breach
Primary Vector
NA
Data Exposed
Names, Addresses, Social Security numbers, Driverโ€™s license or government-issued identification numbers, Health insurance details, Medical conditions and diagnoses, Dates of birth
First Detected by Rankiteo
November 02, 2022
Last Updated Score
November 11, 2025

If the player does not load, you can open the video directly.

newsone

Key Highlights From This Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Precision Imaging Centers's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteoโ€™s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Precision Imaging Centers Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteoโ€™s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
newsone

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Precision Imaging Centers breach identified under incident ID PRE3003030111125.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Precision Imaging Centers's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/precisionimagingcenters, the number of followers: 1344, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 132 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 762 and after the incident was 698 with a difference of -64 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Precision Imaging Centers and their customers.

On 22 June 2023, Precision Imaging Centers disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Precision Imaging Centers Data Breach Settlement".

Precision Imaging Centers, a healthcare provider based in Jacksonville, Florida, experienced a cybersecurity incident on or around November 2, 2022, where an unauthorized actor accessed sensitive patient data, including names, addresses, Social Security numbers, driverโ€™s licen...

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Names, Addresses and Social Security numbers.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Written notifications sent to affected individuals on or around June 22, 2023; public substitute notices for undeliverable mail.

The case underscores how Settled (class action lawsuit resolved), with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notifications sent to affected individuals; settlement claims process established.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized actor gained access to its network (no explicit vector, but implies credential misuse). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating compromised information included names, SSNs, driverโ€™s license numbers, PHI. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including unauthorized actor ... exfiltrated sensitive patient data, and data acquired by unauthorized actor (data_breach.exfiltration). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (5%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware such as null (excluded; no evidence of encryption, but included for completeness) and Resource Hijacking (T1496) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating risking long-term reputational and financial harm to affected individuals (misuse of PII/PHI). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

newsone

Sources