Comparison Overview

Pratt & Associates

VS

Casa Cornelia Law Center

Pratt & Associates

The Pruneyard Tower I, Campbell, CA, 95008, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Pratt & Associates is a boutique law firm specializing in real estate, business and employment law, community associations , condominiums, neighbor law, construction, asbestos defense, and general litigation. The attorneys of Pratt & Associates are all long time residents of the South Bay area, who have extensive experience in each of their listed specialties. Pratt & Associates was founded in 2006, by lawyers who had formerly practiced at three prominent Bay Area law firms. The firm provides personalized service and advice to businesses, land owners, homeowners, and employers, as well as individuals.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Casa Cornelia Law Center

525 B St, San Diego, CA, 92101, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Casa Cornelia Law Center provides quality pro bono legal services to victims of human and civil rights violations. Casa Cornelia's clients include: children, victims of domestic violence, victims of violent crimes, and asylum seekers. These victims, though eligible for legal solace, are often hindered from relief due to fear, poverty, or language barriers.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 76
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pratt-&-associates_2.jpeg
Pratt & Associates
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/casa-cornelia-law-center.jpeg
Casa Cornelia Law Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pratt & Associates
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Casa Cornelia Law Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pratt & Associates in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Casa Cornelia Law Center in 2025.

Incident History — Pratt & Associates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pratt & Associates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Casa Cornelia Law Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Casa Cornelia Law Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pratt-&-associates_2.jpeg
Pratt & Associates
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/casa-cornelia-law-center.jpeg
Casa Cornelia Law Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pratt & Associates company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Casa Cornelia Law Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Casa Cornelia Law Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pratt & Associates company.

In the current year, Casa Cornelia Law Center company and Pratt & Associates company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Casa Cornelia Law Center company nor Pratt & Associates company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Casa Cornelia Law Center company nor Pratt & Associates company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Casa Cornelia Law Center company nor Pratt & Associates company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pratt & Associates company nor Casa Cornelia Law Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pratt & Associates nor Casa Cornelia Law Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pratt & Associates company nor Casa Cornelia Law Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Casa Cornelia Law Center company employs more people globally than Pratt & Associates company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Pratt & Associates nor Casa Cornelia Law Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pratt & Associates nor Casa Cornelia Law Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pratt & Associates nor Casa Cornelia Law Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pratt & Associates nor Casa Cornelia Law Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pratt & Associates nor Casa Cornelia Law Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pratt & Associates nor Casa Cornelia Law Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X