Comparison Overview

Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District

VS

School and State Finance Project

Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District

208 Kimberly Dr, Cleburne, 76031, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 700 and 749

The Prairielands GCD was created in response to a finding by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality that groundwater shortages were expected in Ellis, Hill, Johnson, and Somervell counties over the next 25 years. The Prairielands GCD seeks to balance the needs of all groundwater users with the requirements of a sustainable aquifer. The District operates in a fair and equitable manner through a management plan and rules. They are designed to prevent waste, collect data, plan for future resources, and educate people about water conservation and aquifer protection. The District protects property values by preserving the quantity and quality of groundwater for future generations. Through a system of well spacing rules, minimum tract size requirements, and the District's Desired Future Conditions, the competition between wells is reduced. Members of the board are appointed by the county commissioners in Ellis, Hill, Johnson, and Somervell counties. The board consists of 8 directors, 2 from each of the 4 counties. Initial board-member terms are staggered 2 and 4 years, followed by 4-year terms.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

School and State Finance Project

316 North Main Street, Southington, 06489, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The School and State Finance Project is a nonpartisan, nonprofit policy organization that works collaboratively with policymakers, communities, and other key stakeholders to develop data-driven solutions that ensure all public school students receive equitable education funding that supports their learning needs. Since our founding in 2015, we have secured an additional $526 million in need-based funding for Connecticut's public school students, directly engaged nearly 15,000 community members, and led the effort to implement a comprehensive, student-centered funding formula. We are an independent and trustworthy source of high-quality research and accessible analysis, and serve as a bridge between those who demand equity for all students and the elected leaders who are charged with making policy. Our work includes conducting front-line community engagement work with families, students, and schools; building public knowledge about how Connecticut funds K-12 education; and increasing transparency around education funding and district spending by providing greater public access to timely, accurate, and easy-to-understand data and information.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prairielands-groundwater-conservation-district.jpeg
Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schoolstatefinance.jpeg
School and State Finance Project
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
School and State Finance Project
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for School and State Finance Project in 2025.

Incident History — Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — School and State Finance Project (X = Date, Y = Severity)

School and State Finance Project cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prairielands-groundwater-conservation-district.jpeg
Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schoolstatefinance.jpeg
School and State Finance Project
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District company and School and State Finance Project company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, School and State Finance Project company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District company.

In the current year, School and State Finance Project company and Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither School and State Finance Project company nor Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither School and State Finance Project company nor Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither School and State Finance Project company nor Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District company nor School and State Finance Project company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District nor School and State Finance Project holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District company nor School and State Finance Project company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

School and State Finance Project company employs more people globally than Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District nor School and State Finance Project holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District nor School and State Finance Project holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District nor School and State Finance Project holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District nor School and State Finance Project holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District nor School and State Finance Project holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Prairielands Groundwater Conservation District nor School and State Finance Project holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H