Comparison Overview

Prairiefire Consulting Inc.

VS

MORGAN MARINE LTD

Prairiefire Consulting Inc.

University of Illinois South Research Park, Champaign, IL, 61820, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Prairiefire can teach your engineers how to design quality into mechanical systems. Analysis, training, & strategy based around Sensitivity-Based Design We improve your quality by reducing its sensitivity to real world variation, preventing and solving problems throughout the design and manufacturing cycle. We emphasize purposeful design, focusing on the concrete effects of geometry and multi-physics, not just statistics. Results of our work can be seen across industries from medical equipment to leisure activities to heavy machinery, our design methodologies will help reduce your product and process variations saving you time, money, and frustration. See some of our customers at http://www.pfcae.com/about-us/testimonials and consider how we can ease your pain.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MORGAN MARINE LTD

Llandybie, Ammanford, SA18 3JG, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Morgan Marine is a UK leader in the design, manufacture and installation of standard and bespoke non-security and LPCB security rated enclosures, door-sets, barsets, cages, access covers and ventilation options to the utilities, rail, construction, renewables and security sectors. Engineering GRP and steel since 1965, Morgan Marine operates from a prestigious sales and manufacturing site in South Wales with over 9 acres and 120,000 sq. ft of manufacturing. The company is managed by a team of experienced professionals and has full in house sales, engineering and design support.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 73
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prairiefire-consulting-inc..jpeg
Prairiefire Consulting Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/morgan-marine-limited.jpeg
MORGAN MARINE LTD
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Prairiefire Consulting Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MORGAN MARINE LTD
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prairiefire Consulting Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MORGAN MARINE LTD in 2025.

Incident History — Prairiefire Consulting Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prairiefire Consulting Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MORGAN MARINE LTD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MORGAN MARINE LTD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prairiefire-consulting-inc..jpeg
Prairiefire Consulting Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/morgan-marine-limited.jpeg
MORGAN MARINE LTD
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Prairiefire Consulting Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MORGAN MARINE LTD company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MORGAN MARINE LTD company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Prairiefire Consulting Inc. company.

In the current year, MORGAN MARINE LTD company and Prairiefire Consulting Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MORGAN MARINE LTD company nor Prairiefire Consulting Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MORGAN MARINE LTD company nor Prairiefire Consulting Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MORGAN MARINE LTD company nor Prairiefire Consulting Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Prairiefire Consulting Inc. company nor MORGAN MARINE LTD company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Prairiefire Consulting Inc. nor MORGAN MARINE LTD holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Prairiefire Consulting Inc. company nor MORGAN MARINE LTD company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MORGAN MARINE LTD company employs more people globally than Prairiefire Consulting Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Prairiefire Consulting Inc. nor MORGAN MARINE LTD holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Prairiefire Consulting Inc. nor MORGAN MARINE LTD holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Prairiefire Consulting Inc. nor MORGAN MARINE LTD holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Prairiefire Consulting Inc. nor MORGAN MARINE LTD holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Prairiefire Consulting Inc. nor MORGAN MARINE LTD holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Prairiefire Consulting Inc. nor MORGAN MARINE LTD holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H