Comparison Overview

Prairie State Gaming

VS

Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino

Prairie State Gaming

49 West Galena Boulevard, None, Aurora, IL, US, 60506
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Prairie State Gaming is one of the largest, most respected video gaming terminal operators in Illinois. Our operations include more than 1,700 gaming terminals across a network of more than 430 bar and retail gaming establishments in the state. Prairie State Gaming is the only Illinois video gaming terminal operator with the financial strength to quickly roll out your games, to back them with the best-in-class support, and the experience to operate in a highly regulated environment. With nine route offices throughout the State, we've got your Illinois needs covered regardless of your location! Our team of Account Managers, Collectors and Technicians are the most responsive in the business. When you need help, Prairie State Gaming will make sure you get fast, reliable and consistent service regardless of your location. We make sure your up-time is at its most optimized, which means more gaming for valued guests.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 60
Subsidiaries: 41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino

1545 E Highway 20, Nice, California, 95464, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Opened in 1989, Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino is owned and operated by the Robinson Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians. Sitting on the beautiful north shore of Clear Lake in Lake County, Robinson Rancheria offers a true resort experience by providing superior comfort guests not only expect, but deserve. With over 300+ slot machines & 800 seat Bingo Hall, and strong amenities.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 95
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prairie-state-gaming.jpeg
Prairie State Gaming
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robinson-rancheria-resort-casino.jpeg
Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Prairie State Gaming
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prairie State Gaming in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino in 2025.

Incident History — Prairie State Gaming (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prairie State Gaming cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prairie-state-gaming.jpeg
Prairie State Gaming
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robinson-rancheria-resort-casino.jpeg
Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Prairie State Gaming company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Prairie State Gaming company.

In the current year, Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino company and Prairie State Gaming company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino company nor Prairie State Gaming company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino company nor Prairie State Gaming company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino company nor Prairie State Gaming company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Prairie State Gaming company nor Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Prairie State Gaming nor Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Prairie State Gaming company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino company.

Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino company employs more people globally than Prairie State Gaming company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Prairie State Gaming nor Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Prairie State Gaming nor Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Prairie State Gaming nor Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Prairie State Gaming nor Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Prairie State Gaming nor Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Prairie State Gaming nor Robinson Rancheria Resort & Casino holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H