Comparison Overview

PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail.

VS

Drukkerij Groels

PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail.

920 SW 9th Ave, Amarillo, Texas, 79101, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

PPS & Zip Print combine design, print and mail experts under one roof with a unique flow of skills to work with your budget, meet your deadline, and extend excellent customer service for great results. PPS / Zip Print have joined forces to enhance our print and design services, ensuring we meet the needs of the Midland, Odessa, Lubbock, and Amarillo communities, as well as reaching into other Texas cities and beyond. Together, we are passionately dedicated to not just meeting, but exceeding the expectations of our valued customers. PPS / Zip Print 920 SW 9th Street Amarillo, Texas 79101 Office: 806.373.5919 Plains Presort Services 1418 Crickets Avenue Lubbock, Texas 79401 Office: 806.762.2224

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Drukkerij Groels

De Grote Beer 10, ’s-Hertogenbosch, 5215 MP, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Drukkerij Groels (fsc gecertificeerd) staat voor kwaliteit en innovatie! Ervaren vakmensen en de laatste technologie gecombineerd in 1 hybride bedrijf. Onze relaties kiezen bewust voor ons concept: druk & print & afwerking in eigen huis. Specialiteiten zijn: 3d lak, (laser)stansen, foliedruk, metallicdruk Om meer resultaat uit de communicatie-inspanningen te halen bieden we ook crossmediale diensten aan. We helpen daarmee uw doelstellingen te realiseren met print, online en digitale media. Voor specialistisch werk neemt u contact op met een van onze accountmanagers en voor het standaard-drukwerk, in kleine oplagen, kunt u ook gebruik maken van onze webportal www.ipress4u.nl. Bekijk op www.groels.nl de verdere mogelijkheden.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pps-mail-ltd-.jpeg
PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/drukkerij-groels.jpeg
Drukkerij Groels
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Drukkerij Groels
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Drukkerij Groels in 2025.

Incident History — PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Drukkerij Groels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Drukkerij Groels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pps-mail-ltd-.jpeg
PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/drukkerij-groels.jpeg
Drukkerij Groels
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Drukkerij Groels company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Drukkerij Groels company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail. company.

In the current year, Drukkerij Groels company and PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Drukkerij Groels company nor PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Drukkerij Groels company nor PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Drukkerij Groels company nor PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail. company nor Drukkerij Groels company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail. nor Drukkerij Groels holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail. company nor Drukkerij Groels company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail. company employs more people globally than Drukkerij Groels company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail. nor Drukkerij Groels holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail. nor Drukkerij Groels holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail. nor Drukkerij Groels holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail. nor Drukkerij Groels holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail. nor Drukkerij Groels holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PPS / Zip Print - Design. Print. Mail. nor Drukkerij Groels holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N