Comparison Overview

PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators)

VS

National Infusion Center Association (NICA)

PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators)

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.ppn.co.za

PPN is one of the first Preferred Provider organisations of any discipline to enter the medical aid market. Our founding principles of integrity, transparency and trust remain the backbone of our business principle. We partner with Medical Schemes for Optical Benefit Management Services. PPN provides a highly sophisticated, market leading, claims administration process, which includes an innovative optical benefit design and fraud controls to contain both scheme exposure and member co-payment exposure. In conjunction with honesty and trust, the PPN team in our daily activities are fully committed to the company values: • Caring, • Accountability, • Excellence, • Respect • Integrity The key focus for PPN is to ensure that our medical aid members receive an exceptional service experience and that our fraud interventions result in eradicating most of the FWA. PPN employs new talent and invests in systems continuously to stay on the forefront of new technology.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 106
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

National Infusion Center Association (NICA)

3307 Northland Dr, Austin, Texas, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
https://infusioncenter.org

National Infusion Center (NICA) is a nonprofit trade association and the nation’s voice for non-hospital, community-based infusion providers that offer a safe, more affordable, and more cost-effective alternative to hospital care settings for provider-administered medications. NICA's efforts are focused on delivery channel sustainability and expansion, buy-and-bill protection, maintaining net positive reimbursement, improving treatment adherence, and promoting patient safety and care quality. We support policies that improve drug affordability for beneficiaries, increase price transparency, reduce disparities in quality of care and safety across care settings, and enable care delivery in the highest-quality, lowest-cost care setting. Our goal is to help decision makers understand the value of receiving provider-administered medications in non-hospital care settings and ensure that the community-based infusion center remains a safe, more efficient, and more cost-effective alternative to hospital care settings.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ppn.jpeg
PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-infusion-center-association-nica-.jpeg
National Infusion Center Association (NICA)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Infusion Center Association (NICA)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Infusion Center Association (NICA) in 2025.

Incident History — PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Infusion Center Association (NICA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Infusion Center Association (NICA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ppn.jpeg
PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-infusion-center-association-nica-.jpeg
National Infusion Center Association (NICA)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Infusion Center Association (NICA) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, National Infusion Center Association (NICA) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) company.

In the current year, National Infusion Center Association (NICA) company and PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Infusion Center Association (NICA) company nor PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Infusion Center Association (NICA) company nor PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National Infusion Center Association (NICA) company nor PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) company nor National Infusion Center Association (NICA) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) nor National Infusion Center Association (NICA) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) company nor National Infusion Center Association (NICA) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) company employs more people globally than National Infusion Center Association (NICA) company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) nor National Infusion Center Association (NICA) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) nor National Infusion Center Association (NICA) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) nor National Infusion Center Association (NICA) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) nor National Infusion Center Association (NICA) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) nor National Infusion Center Association (NICA) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) nor National Infusion Center Association (NICA) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References