Comparison Overview

SOS Print + Media Group Australia

VS

National Traffic Signs

SOS Print + Media Group Australia

65 Burrows Road, Alexandria, Australia, 2015, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

SOS is a print, media and distribution company in Alexandria, offering offset and digital print, POS concept and production, inventory management, distribution and all associated services. We use the latest digital technology in production and in customer service. SOS turns over 31 million AUD and employs 110 full time staff. SOS is accredited to ISO 9001, 14001, 12647-2 and certified by FSC and PEFC.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 542
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

National Traffic Signs

14521 60th St N, Clearwater, Florida, 33760, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

National Traffic Signs was established in 1962 in Clearwater, Florida. As the name implies our specialty was the manufacture of D.O.T. Traffic and other exterior grade metal signs such as real estate and contractor site signs. From the very beginning, our customers'​ needs drove our business. Providing them with friendly, fast, personal service and the growing diversity of products they required has always been our number one priority. As our customer base expanded, so did our product lines and our manufacturing, warehouse and office facilities. Today, National Traffic Signs, Inc. is still a leading manufacturer of U.S.D.O.T. and F.D.O.T. compliant signage and hardware, but that is only a part of what we offer. Aluminum blanks, sheeting, and electronic cuttable films are all here in one place for signmakers of all sizes from one-man shops to large manufacturers. Stripers, pavers, barricade companies and contractors rely on NTS as a one-stop source for all their pavement marking and traffic control needs. We offer specially formulated striping paints, marking media and tools, thermoplastic, pavement markers, adhesives, ADA detectable warning tiles and a wide range of items including products to help ensure the safety of the men and women working on our country's busy roadways.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pp.jpeg
SOS Print + Media Group Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-traffic-signs.jpeg
National Traffic Signs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SOS Print + Media Group Australia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Traffic Signs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SOS Print + Media Group Australia in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Traffic Signs in 2025.

Incident History — SOS Print + Media Group Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SOS Print + Media Group Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Traffic Signs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Traffic Signs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pp.jpeg
SOS Print + Media Group Australia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-traffic-signs.jpeg
National Traffic Signs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SOS Print + Media Group Australia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Traffic Signs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, National Traffic Signs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SOS Print + Media Group Australia company.

In the current year, National Traffic Signs company and SOS Print + Media Group Australia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Traffic Signs company nor SOS Print + Media Group Australia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Traffic Signs company nor SOS Print + Media Group Australia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National Traffic Signs company nor SOS Print + Media Group Australia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SOS Print + Media Group Australia company nor National Traffic Signs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SOS Print + Media Group Australia nor National Traffic Signs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SOS Print + Media Group Australia company nor National Traffic Signs company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SOS Print + Media Group Australia company employs more people globally than National Traffic Signs company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither SOS Print + Media Group Australia nor National Traffic Signs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SOS Print + Media Group Australia nor National Traffic Signs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SOS Print + Media Group Australia nor National Traffic Signs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SOS Print + Media Group Australia nor National Traffic Signs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SOS Print + Media Group Australia nor National Traffic Signs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SOS Print + Media Group Australia nor National Traffic Signs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N