Comparison Overview

Powers & Santola, LLP

VS

Brandstock Group

Powers & Santola, LLP

39 North Pearl Street, Albany, NY, 12207, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Powers & Santola is one of the nation's preeminent medical malpractice and personal injury law firms. We are devoted to representing a limited number of individuals who have been severely injured, or whose family members have been killed, as a result of medical and hospital malpractice or negligence, with emphasis on the failure to provide adequate protection to construction workers and transportation-related injuries. Our firm excels at helping individuals harmed by a needless delay in diagnosing cancer. Due to our extensive background in the area of traumatic brain injury, we represent many individuals with brain and spinal cord injuries, as well as children who were born with neurological impairments (i.e. cerebral palsy, Erb's palsy and brachial plexus injuries). In addition to four of our lawyers being individually honored as “Best Lawyers in America”, the firm of Powers & Santola has repeatedly been recognized as one of the nation’s “Best Law Firms” by U.S. News and World Report and Best Lawyers. The firm has consistently been awarded a tier one ranking in both the areas of Plaintiff’s Medical Malpractice Law and Plaintiff’s Personal Injury Litigation for the Albany, NY metropolitan area. By only accepting a limited number of cases, we can focus all of our attention and assets on achieving an exceptional result for the clients we do accept. Our goal in every case is to achieve a result that will fundamentally change our client’s life for the better.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Brandstock Group

Möhlstraße 2, Munich, 81675, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

From our beginnings in 1994, Brandstock Group has grown into one of the leading providers of Intellectual Property services. Headquartered in Munich, Germany with offices in Italy, US, France, Switzerland, and Slovenia, Brandstock employs over 150 professionals from 43 different countries in a range of disciplines, and our services encompass trademark and patents, monitoring and enforcement, and IP consultancy. We maintain a network of 250 firms of international lawyers and other Intellectual Property professionals that provide specialized advice in individual jurisdictions. This enables us to choose the right professional for the specific client need, and to obtain the best services at a competitive price. Where clients have preferred agents that are not part of the Brandstock network, we’re happy to work with those providers and obtain the best price for their services. We strive to provide fast, professional and cost-effective solutions for our clients, which include major multi-nationals as well as small to medium-sized enterprises. Brandstock has revolutionized pricing, cost transparency and large-scale project management. Our expertise also includes full-service IP portfolio management; litigation and other IP enforcement including anti-counterfeiting programs; domain name registration and management; valuation and asset value consultancy; and benchmarking. Brandstock has invested heavily in custom IT solutions, particularly web-based interactive IT, that enable and differentiate the way we serve our clients. We are proud that our clients consider us a trusted partner in Intellectual Property matters, and value our innovative solutions; accountability; price transparency; and comprehensive understanding of all aspects of IP.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 120
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/powers-&-santola-llp.jpeg
Powers & Santola, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brandstock-services-ag.jpeg
Brandstock Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Powers & Santola, LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Brandstock Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Powers & Santola, LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brandstock Group in 2025.

Incident History — Powers & Santola, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Powers & Santola, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Brandstock Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brandstock Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/powers-&-santola-llp.jpeg
Powers & Santola, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brandstock-services-ag.jpeg
Brandstock Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Powers & Santola, LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Brandstock Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Brandstock Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Powers & Santola, LLP company.

In the current year, Brandstock Group company and Powers & Santola, LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Brandstock Group company nor Powers & Santola, LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Brandstock Group company nor Powers & Santola, LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Brandstock Group company nor Powers & Santola, LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Powers & Santola, LLP company nor Brandstock Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Powers & Santola, LLP nor Brandstock Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Powers & Santola, LLP company nor Brandstock Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Brandstock Group company employs more people globally than Powers & Santola, LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Powers & Santola, LLP nor Brandstock Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Powers & Santola, LLP nor Brandstock Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Powers & Santola, LLP nor Brandstock Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Powers & Santola, LLP nor Brandstock Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Powers & Santola, LLP nor Brandstock Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Powers & Santola, LLP nor Brandstock Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X