Comparison Overview

PowerRail

VS

Cahaba Truck and Equipment

PowerRail

182 Susquehanna Avenue, Exeter, Pennsylvania, 18643, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

PowerRail is a United States-based company, with additional locations in various parts of the world. CEO, Paul Foster, originally formed PowerRail in 2003 in Wilke-Barre, Pennsylvania. Today our Corporate Offices and Main Distribution Center are located in Exeter, Pennsylvania. PowerRail is a certified AAR M-1003 distributor, manufacturer and remanufacturer of aftermarket locomotive parts, offering a wide range of products. We are North America’s leading aftermarket parts provider, supporting both EMD and GE locomotives. In addition to our broad locomotive line, we also provide products for Passenger Transit, Marine and Power Generation markets. Our offering of products includes New and Unit Exchange Remanufactured components to accommodate any budget. Backed by our extensive Engineering and Development Departments, we continually strive to provide Enhanced Products that reduce costs associated with field failures and downtime. From Customer Service, Manufacturing, Quality & Technical Support, Inside & Field Sales, Warehouse & Shipping, PowerRail has only one goal in mind...your total satisfaction.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 87
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cahaba Truck and Equipment

10992 Commercial Dr , Tuscaloosa , Al, 35405, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

At Cahaba Truck, we have partnered with railroads, contractors and other suppliers across the nation to satisfy the demands of our customers. We believe delivering cost effective solutions and incorporating innovative designs and functionality are best achieved by developing a true partnership with each individual customer. Here, we use our experience in developing solutions that have been proven in the field, integrating the best and most cost-effective technology into a lower-cost, higher-value product.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/powerrail.jpeg
PowerRail
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cahaba-truck-and-equipment.jpeg
Cahaba Truck and Equipment
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PowerRail
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cahaba Truck and Equipment
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PowerRail in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cahaba Truck and Equipment in 2025.

Incident History — PowerRail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PowerRail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cahaba Truck and Equipment (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cahaba Truck and Equipment cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/powerrail.jpeg
PowerRail
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cahaba-truck-and-equipment.jpeg
Cahaba Truck and Equipment
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both PowerRail company and Cahaba Truck and Equipment company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Cahaba Truck and Equipment company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PowerRail company.

In the current year, Cahaba Truck and Equipment company and PowerRail company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cahaba Truck and Equipment company nor PowerRail company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cahaba Truck and Equipment company nor PowerRail company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cahaba Truck and Equipment company nor PowerRail company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PowerRail company nor Cahaba Truck and Equipment company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PowerRail nor Cahaba Truck and Equipment holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PowerRail company nor Cahaba Truck and Equipment company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PowerRail company employs more people globally than Cahaba Truck and Equipment company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither PowerRail nor Cahaba Truck and Equipment holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PowerRail nor Cahaba Truck and Equipment holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PowerRail nor Cahaba Truck and Equipment holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PowerRail nor Cahaba Truck and Equipment holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PowerRail nor Cahaba Truck and Equipment holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PowerRail nor Cahaba Truck and Equipment holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H