Comparison Overview

International Power-to-X Hub

VS

Martin Rubber Corporation

International Power-to-X Hub

Köthener Str. 2-3, Berlin, 10963, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 700 and 749

The International Power-to-X Hub is a centre of expertise and collaboration for innovative and sustainable green hydrogen and Power-to-X value chains. Together with our partners, we identify Power-to-X solutions that are adapted to the specifics of each country and lead to sustainable economic transformation. The International Power-to-X Hub builds and fosters strong networks with industry, academia, administrations, and civil society with hubs in Africa, Asia, Europe, and Latin America. Power-to-X enables us to produce anything historically dependent on fossil fuels using only air and renewable electricity. These sustainable, climate neutral e-fuels and chemicals can defossilise high-emissions industries, including the chemical, fertiliser, steel and cement industry, as well as aviation and maritime transport.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Martin Rubber Corporation

2085 Emery Ave, La Habra, 90631, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Martin Rubber Corporation specilizes in molded rubber products. Martin Rubber has manufactured parts that are in space, on planes, trains and automobiles, under the ground and under the sea, drilling for oil, in your houshold appliances, in your medical devices, in your sports bag and pretty much anywhere a flexible seal or device is needed. Martin Rubber's specialty is hydraulic accumulator bladders. Our customer's accumulators are used in Hybrid vehicles, oil production, wind mills, and many more hydraulic applications.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/power-to-x-hub.jpeg
International Power-to-X Hub
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/martin-rubber-corporation.jpeg
Martin Rubber Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
International Power-to-X Hub
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Martin Rubber Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Power-to-X Hub in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Martin Rubber Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — International Power-to-X Hub (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Power-to-X Hub cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Martin Rubber Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Martin Rubber Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/power-to-x-hub.jpeg
International Power-to-X Hub
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/martin-rubber-corporation.jpeg
Martin Rubber Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Martin Rubber Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to International Power-to-X Hub company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Martin Rubber Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to International Power-to-X Hub company.

In the current year, Martin Rubber Corporation company and International Power-to-X Hub company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Martin Rubber Corporation company nor International Power-to-X Hub company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Martin Rubber Corporation company nor International Power-to-X Hub company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Martin Rubber Corporation company nor International Power-to-X Hub company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither International Power-to-X Hub company nor Martin Rubber Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither International Power-to-X Hub nor Martin Rubber Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither International Power-to-X Hub company nor Martin Rubber Corporation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Martin Rubber Corporation company employs more people globally than International Power-to-X Hub company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither International Power-to-X Hub nor Martin Rubber Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither International Power-to-X Hub nor Martin Rubber Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither International Power-to-X Hub nor Martin Rubber Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither International Power-to-X Hub nor Martin Rubber Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither International Power-to-X Hub nor Martin Rubber Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither International Power-to-X Hub nor Martin Rubber Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X