Comparison Overview

Power Technics Ltd.

VS

McClelland Laboratories, Inc.

Power Technics Ltd.

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, KE
Last Update: 2025-11-25

Power Technics Ltd. was established in 1982 to integrate its core activities know-how and experience into superior quality products. Power Technics delivers a full project range, from design implementation to after sales service. With a dedicated staff of 230 people, Power Technics has emjoyed sustained growth and success. Whatever the projects - large office complexes, infrastructure projects, steel industries, cement industries, plastic industries, national lighting schemes - Power Technics proides an integrated solution with its core activity of electrical engineering technology, sheet metal engineering technology, automation and systems. By manufacturing all of our major products in-house, we retain complete control of a project from initial design to final completion. This ensures that all our products meet international criteria and are manufactured to the highest quality standards to reach the level of satisfaction that we envision.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

McClelland Laboratories, Inc.

1016 Greg St, Sparks, Nevada 89431-6040, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

McClelland Laboratories, Inc. has been providing quality laboratory and consulting services to the minerals industry since 1987. Our services include metallurgical, environmental, analytical testing and consulting to meet the needs of our clients during all phases of project development, operation and closure. What started as a lab dedicated to the gold, silver and copper industries has expanded to provide services in a wide range of mineral markets.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/power-technics-ltd..jpeg
Power Technics Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcclelland-laboratories-inc.jpeg
McClelland Laboratories, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Power Technics Ltd.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
McClelland Laboratories, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Power Technics Ltd. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McClelland Laboratories, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Power Technics Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Power Technics Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — McClelland Laboratories, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McClelland Laboratories, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/power-technics-ltd..jpeg
Power Technics Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcclelland-laboratories-inc.jpeg
McClelland Laboratories, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

McClelland Laboratories, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Power Technics Ltd. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, McClelland Laboratories, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Power Technics Ltd. company.

In the current year, McClelland Laboratories, Inc. company and Power Technics Ltd. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither McClelland Laboratories, Inc. company nor Power Technics Ltd. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither McClelland Laboratories, Inc. company nor Power Technics Ltd. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither McClelland Laboratories, Inc. company nor Power Technics Ltd. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Power Technics Ltd. company nor McClelland Laboratories, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Power Technics Ltd. nor McClelland Laboratories, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Power Technics Ltd. company nor McClelland Laboratories, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Power Technics Ltd. company employs more people globally than McClelland Laboratories, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Power Technics Ltd. nor McClelland Laboratories, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Power Technics Ltd. nor McClelland Laboratories, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Power Technics Ltd. nor McClelland Laboratories, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Power Technics Ltd. nor McClelland Laboratories, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Power Technics Ltd. nor McClelland Laboratories, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Power Technics Ltd. nor McClelland Laboratories, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H