Comparison Overview

Power Graphics Digital Imaging

VS

Rogers Printing and Promotional

Power Graphics Digital Imaging

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.power-graphics.com

If you're looking for quality large format printing and displays with a huge selection of products and materials, you've come to the right place. We offer high quality printing for indoor and outdoor displays such as banners, trade show graphics, custom wallpaper murals, floor decals, window graphics and vehicle wraps, the highest quality giclee fine art printing including printing on canvas and watercolor papers, and a wide range of display products such as sign holders, trade show displays, retractable banner stands, and outdoor display hardware.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Rogers Printing and Promotional

21310 John Milless Dr., Rogers, MN 55374, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rogersprintingmn.com

Rogers Printing and Promotional is a full service marketing supplies company specializing in printed materials, promotional items, and design services located just south of I-94 by the Hwy 101 interchange. Rogers Printing started in the garage of owners Roger and Bev Sabot's Main Street home during the spring of 1980. It has been a trusted source of marketing materials for the Rogers, Maple Grove, Osseo, Elk River, St Michael, Albertville, and surrounding areas for over three decades.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/power-graphics-digital-imaging.jpeg
Power Graphics Digital Imaging
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rogers-printing-and-promotional.jpeg
Rogers Printing and Promotional
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Power Graphics Digital Imaging
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rogers Printing and Promotional
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Power Graphics Digital Imaging in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rogers Printing and Promotional in 2025.

Incident History — Power Graphics Digital Imaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Power Graphics Digital Imaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rogers Printing and Promotional (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rogers Printing and Promotional cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/power-graphics-digital-imaging.jpeg
Power Graphics Digital Imaging
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rogers-printing-and-promotional.jpeg
Rogers Printing and Promotional
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rogers Printing and Promotional company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Power Graphics Digital Imaging company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rogers Printing and Promotional company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Power Graphics Digital Imaging company.

In the current year, Rogers Printing and Promotional company and Power Graphics Digital Imaging company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rogers Printing and Promotional company nor Power Graphics Digital Imaging company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rogers Printing and Promotional company nor Power Graphics Digital Imaging company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rogers Printing and Promotional company nor Power Graphics Digital Imaging company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Power Graphics Digital Imaging company nor Rogers Printing and Promotional company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Power Graphics Digital Imaging nor Rogers Printing and Promotional holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Power Graphics Digital Imaging company nor Rogers Printing and Promotional company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rogers Printing and Promotional company employs more people globally than Power Graphics Digital Imaging company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Power Graphics Digital Imaging nor Rogers Printing and Promotional holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Power Graphics Digital Imaging nor Rogers Printing and Promotional holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Power Graphics Digital Imaging nor Rogers Printing and Promotional holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Power Graphics Digital Imaging nor Rogers Printing and Promotional holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Power Graphics Digital Imaging nor Rogers Printing and Promotional holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Power Graphics Digital Imaging nor Rogers Printing and Promotional holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References