Comparison Overview

Poway Unified School District

VS

Prince George's County Public Schools

Poway Unified School District

15251 Avenue of Science, None, San Diego, California, US, 92128
Last Update: 2025-07-26 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Welcome to the Poway Unified School District! We are a national leader in K-12 public education. The Poway Unified School District is located in northern San Diego County, California. PUSD operates 25 elementary schools (K-5), one elementary & middle school combination (TK-8th), six middle schools (6-8), one continuation high school, five comprehensive high schools (9-12), and one adult school. 26 schools are located in the city of San Diego; 12 schools in the city of Poway. The District serves over 36,000 students, and is the third largest school district in the county.

NAICS: 6111
NAICS Definition: Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees: 2,956
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Prince George's County Public Schools

14201 School Lane, None, Upper Marlboro, MD, US, 20772
Last Update: 2025-07-26 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Prince George's County Public Schools (PGCPS), one of the nation's 25 largest school districts, has 200 schools and centers, more than 133,000 students and 22,000 employees. The school system serves a diverse student population from urban, suburban and rural communities located in the Washington, DC suburbs. PGCPS is nationally recognized for innovative programs and initiatives that provide students with unique learning opportunities, including arts integration, environmental and financial literacy, and language immersion.

NAICS: 6111
NAICS Definition: Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees: 13,087
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/poway-unified-school-district.jpeg
Poway Unified School District
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pgcps.jpeg
Prince George's County Public Schools
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Poway Unified School District
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Prince George's County Public Schools
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Poway Unified School District in 2025.

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prince George's County Public Schools in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Poway Unified School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Poway Unified School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Prince George's County Public Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prince George's County Public Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/poway-unified-school-district.jpeg
Poway Unified School District
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2016
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pgcps.jpeg
Prince George's County Public Schools
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Poway Unified School District company and Prince George's County Public Schools company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Prince George's County Public Schools company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Poway Unified School District company.

In the current year, Prince George's County Public Schools company and Poway Unified School District company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Prince George's County Public Schools company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Poway Unified School District company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Prince George's County Public Schools company and Poway Unified School District company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Prince George's County Public Schools company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Poway Unified School District company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Poway Unified School District company nor Prince George's County Public Schools company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Poway Unified School District company nor Prince George's County Public Schools company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Prince George's County Public Schools company employs more people globally than Poway Unified School District company, reflecting its scale as a Primary and Secondary Education.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in Tomofun Furbo 360 and Furbo Mini. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /etc/shadow of the component Password Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of weak hash. The physical device can be targeted for the attack. The attack requires a high level of complexity. The exploitability is regarded as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The firmware versions determined to be affected are Furbo 360 up to FB0035_FW_036 and Furbo Mini up to MC0020_FW_074. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 1.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was found in Tomofun Furbo 360 and Furbo Mini. The affected element is an unknown function of the component Root Account Handler. Performing manipulation results in use of hard-coded password. The attack must be initiated from a local position. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitability is described as difficult. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The firmware versions determined to be affected are Furbo 360 up to FB0035_FW_036 and Furbo Mini up to MC0020_FW_074. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.0
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability has been found in Tomofun Furbo 360 and Furbo Mini. Impacted is an unknown function of the file TF_FQDN.json of the component GATT Interface URL Handler. Such manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The firmware versions determined to be affected are Furbo 360 up to FB0035_FW_036 and Furbo Mini up to MC0020_FW_074. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.6
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in Tomofun Furbo 360 and Furbo Mini. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component GATT Service. This manipulation of the argument DeviceToken causes information disclosure. The attack is only possible within the local network. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been published and may be used. The firmware versions determined to be affected are Furbo 360 up to FB0035_FW_036 and Furbo Mini up to MC0020_FW_074. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.8
Severity: HIGH
AV:A/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Tomofun Furbo 360 and Furbo Mini. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component GATT Service. The manipulation results in improper access controls. The attack can only be performed from the local network. The exploit is now public and may be used. The firmware versions determined to be affected are Furbo 360 up to FB0035_FW_036 and Furbo Mini up to MC0020_FW_074. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:A/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X