Comparison Overview

POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.)

VS

Jewish Museum London

POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.)

1684 Victoria Street, Baldwin, NY, 11510, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

For nearly 40 years, Paul Orselli has worked to create inventive science museums and playful children’s museums, including director-level positions at the Discovery Museums in Acton, Massachusetts, the Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum, and the Long Island Children’s Museum. In 2002, Paul became President and Chief Instigator of POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop.) POW! was created to utilize Paul’s creativity, design talents, and collaborative resources to help museums and other cultural institutions develop innovative exhibit components, exhibitions, and educational programs. POW! has consulted on museum projects throughout North America, Europe, and the Middle East. Our clients include such notable organizations as the New York Hall of Science, the Exploratorium, the National Science Foundation, and Science Projects in London.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jewish Museum London

Raymond Burton House, London, NW1 7NB, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-21

The Jewish Museum London is a landmark Museum that celebrates Jewish life and cultural diversity. Our education programmes and activities encourage a sense of discovery and creativity and tell the story of Jewish history, culture and religion in an innovative and compelling way and engage with people of all backgrounds and faiths to explore Jewish heritage and identity as part of the wider story of Britain. The only museum in London dedicated to a minority group, we aspire to continue to build interfaith understanding, inspiring people to take a stand against racism and to look at the world from a different point of view.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pow-paul-orselli-workshop-inc-.jpeg
POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jewish-museum-london.jpeg
Jewish Museum London
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jewish Museum London
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.) in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jewish Museum London in 2026.

Incident History — POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jewish Museum London (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jewish Museum London cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pow-paul-orselli-workshop-inc-.jpeg
POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jewish-museum-london.jpeg
Jewish Museum London
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Jewish Museum London company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jewish Museum London company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.) company.

In the current year, Jewish Museum London company and POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jewish Museum London company nor POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jewish Museum London company nor POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jewish Museum London company nor POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.) company nor Jewish Museum London company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.) nor Jewish Museum London holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.) company nor Jewish Museum London company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Jewish Museum London company employs more people globally than POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.) company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.) nor Jewish Museum London holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.) nor Jewish Museum London holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.) nor Jewish Museum London holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.) nor Jewish Museum London holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.) nor Jewish Museum London holds HIPAA certification.

Neither POW! (Paul Orselli Workshop, Inc.) nor Jewish Museum London holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H