Comparison Overview

POW!

VS

University of Texas Press

POW!

37 Main Street, Brooklyn, NY, 11201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.POWkidsbooks.com

An imprint of and distributed by powerHouse Books, POW! publishes visually driven, imagination-fueled books for kids. Our goal is to develop children's aesthetic sensibilities at an early age with strong text and captivating images. POW! combines an offbeat or humorous sensibility with outstanding design to make books that delight kids and adults equally.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

University of Texas Press

3001 Lake Austin Blvd, Austin, 78703, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799
http://utpress.utexas.edu/

The University of Texas Press is a book and journal publisher—a focal point where the life experiences, insights, and specialized knowledge of writers converge to be disseminated in both print and digital formats. Established in 1950, UT Press has published more than 3,000 books over six decades. Under the direction of David Hamrick, the Press produces approximately one hundred new books and eleven journals each year. By launching a scholarly press, the University of Texas at Austin made several important statements: books matter; books educate; and publishing good books is a public responsibility and a valuable component of higher education.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pow-.jpeg
POW!
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-texas-press.jpeg
University of Texas Press
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
POW!
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Texas Press
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for POW! in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Texas Press in 2025.

Incident History — POW! (X = Date, Y = Severity)

POW! cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Texas Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Texas Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pow-.jpeg
POW!
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-texas-press.jpeg
University of Texas Press
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

POW! company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Texas Press company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, University of Texas Press company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to POW! company.

In the current year, University of Texas Press company and POW! company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University of Texas Press company nor POW! company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither University of Texas Press company nor POW! company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither University of Texas Press company nor POW! company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither POW! company nor University of Texas Press company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither POW! nor University of Texas Press holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither POW! company nor University of Texas Press company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

University of Texas Press company employs more people globally than POW! company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither POW! nor University of Texas Press holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither POW! nor University of Texas Press holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither POW! nor University of Texas Press holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither POW! nor University of Texas Press holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither POW! nor University of Texas Press holds HIPAA certification.

Neither POW! nor University of Texas Press holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References