Comparison Overview

Pouncing Pachyderm Productions

VS

Mission Hills China

Pouncing Pachyderm Productions

3875 Whitehouse Creek Rd Pescadero, California 94060-0000, US
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)

Excellent

Store contacts, calendars, photos, music, books, apps and more in the cloud and access them on all your devices.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2-10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mission Hills China

Mission Hills Road Shenzhen, 518110, CN
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)

Excellent

Mission Hills China, owner and operator of Mission Hills Shenzhen and Mission Hills Resort Hainan, is a key player in the countryโ€™s fledgling sports and leisure industry. The Mission Hills brand encompasses several sub-brands, including Mission Hills Golf Clubs, Mission Hills Residences, as well as Mission Hills Hotels & Resorts. It is also the host, promoter and underwriter of several major golf tournaments, including the Omega Mission Hills World Cup and the Mission Hills Star Trophy. The company employs approximately 11,000 people across its two operations.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pouncing-pachyderm-productions.jpeg
Pouncing Pachyderm Productions
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mission-hills-china.jpeg
Mission Hills China
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Pouncing Pachyderm Productions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mission Hills China
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Recreational Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pouncing Pachyderm Productions in 2025.

Incidents vs Recreational Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mission Hills China in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Pouncing Pachyderm Productions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pouncing Pachyderm Productions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Mission Hills China (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mission Hills China cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pouncing-pachyderm-productions.jpeg
Pouncing Pachyderm Productions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mission-hills-china.jpeg
Mission Hills China
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Pouncing Pachyderm Productions company and Mission Hills China company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Mission Hills China company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pouncing Pachyderm Productions company.

In the current year, Mission Hills China company and Pouncing Pachyderm Productions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mission Hills China company nor Pouncing Pachyderm Productions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mission Hills China company nor Pouncing Pachyderm Productions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mission Hills China company nor Pouncing Pachyderm Productions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pouncing Pachyderm Productions company nor Mission Hills China company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pouncing Pachyderm Productions company nor Mission Hills China company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Pouncing Pachyderm Productions company nor Mission Hills China company has publicly disclosed the exact number of their employees.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X