Comparison Overview

Pottermore Publishing

VS

Icon Books

Pottermore Publishing

PO Box 7828, London, London, W1A 4GE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Pottermore Publishing is the global digital audiobook and eBook publisher of J.K. Rowling’s multi-million bestselling Harry Potter series and associated titles. Working with a global network of retail and library partners, we prioritise accessibility, creativity, and innovation as we bring these beloved stories to life for each generation of readers and listeners to discover.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Icon Books

39 - 41 North Road, London, undefined, N7 9DP, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Icon Books is an independent publisher founded in 1992 – making 2020 our 28th anniversary – which specialises in intelligent, quality non-fiction for a general audience. Our Introducing Graphic Guide series thrives alongside a list of books in science, history, politics, sport, language, humour and much else besides. Based primarily near Caledonian Road station in north London, Icon publish books in all English-speaking markets of the world – and many non-English speaking ones too. We are part of the Independent Alliance sales grouping in the UK and other markets, and our books are sold by leading distributors around the world, such as PGW in the USA, PGC in Canada, Allen & Unwin in Australasia, Jonathan Ball in South Africa and Penguin Random House in Singapore, Malaysia and India. Our translation rights sales are managed by the Marsh Agency in London.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pottermore.jpeg
Pottermore Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icon-books.jpeg
Icon Books
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pottermore Publishing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Icon Books
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pottermore Publishing in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Icon Books in 2025.

Incident History — Pottermore Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pottermore Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Icon Books (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Icon Books cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pottermore.jpeg
Pottermore Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icon-books.jpeg
Icon Books
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Pottermore Publishing company and Icon Books company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Icon Books company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pottermore Publishing company.

In the current year, Icon Books company and Pottermore Publishing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Icon Books company nor Pottermore Publishing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Icon Books company nor Pottermore Publishing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Icon Books company nor Pottermore Publishing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pottermore Publishing company nor Icon Books company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pottermore Publishing nor Icon Books holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Pottermore Publishing company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Icon Books company.

Pottermore Publishing company employs more people globally than Icon Books company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Pottermore Publishing nor Icon Books holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pottermore Publishing nor Icon Books holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pottermore Publishing nor Icon Books holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pottermore Publishing nor Icon Books holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pottermore Publishing nor Icon Books holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pottermore Publishing nor Icon Books holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.