Comparison Overview

PostNL

VS

CMA CGM

PostNL

Waldorpstraat 3, Den Haag, Zuid-Holland, NL, 2521 CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Welcome! We are PostNL. Your favorite delivery service is what we want to be. Every day, over 35,000 colleagues work hard to achieve this goal, on your streets and in your neighborhood, in our sorting centers and depots, and at the office. On an average day, we deliver about 1.1 million packages and 7.4 million letters, so chances are we will meet. In addition to delivering, we're always innovating. For example, we're developing more sustainable ways of delivering and clever products and services like delivery preferences. Making your life easier, that is why we continuously work on new and improved products and services. Such as the parcel locker and convenient online services for webshops and other business customers. Will you help us be your favorite delivery service? Come join us and become a colleague! Check out our job opportunities at www.postnl.nl/werkenbij (work with us). See you soon or as we say in Dutch: tot snel!

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 5,861
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CMA CGM

4, Quai d'arenc, Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, FR, 13002
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 700 and 749

The CMA CGM Group is a global player in sea, land, air and logistics solutions, true to its corporate Purpose, "We imagine better ways to serve a world in motion". Present in 177 countries, it employs 160,000 people, of which nearly 6,000 in Marseilles where its head office is located. The world's 3rd largest shipping company, CMA CGM serves more than 420 ports across 5 continents with a fleet of over 650 vessels. In 2024, CMA CGM carried over 23 million TEU (twenty-foot equivalent unit) containers. Its subsidiary CEVA Logistics, one of the world's top five players, operates 1,000 warehouses and handled 15 million shipments in 2024. CMA CGM AIR CARGO, the Group's air freight division, will operate a fleet of 6 cargo aircraft by 2025. CMA Media, France's 3rd largest private media group, includes RMC-BFM and several national and regional press titles (La Tribune Dimanche, La Tribune, La Provence and Corse Matin). Committed to energy transition, the CMA CGM Group is aiming for Net Zero Carbon by 2050. The CMA CGM Foundation provides humanitarian aid in crisis situations, and is committed to education for all and equal opportunities throughout the world. To date, the CMA CGM Foundation has transported 63,000 tons of humanitarian aid to 97 countries and supported over 550 educational projects.

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 29,493
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/postnl.jpeg
PostNL
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cma-cgm.jpeg
CMA CGM
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PostNL
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CMA CGM
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PostNL in 2025.

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CMA CGM in 2025.

Incident History — PostNL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PostNL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CMA CGM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CMA CGM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/postnl.jpeg
PostNL
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cma-cgm.jpeg
CMA CGM
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2021
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: ransomware (Ragnar Locker)
Motivation: financial gain, data theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2021
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2020
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

FAQ

PostNL company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CMA CGM company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

CMA CGM company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas PostNL company has not reported any.

In the current year, CMA CGM company and PostNL company have not reported any cyber incidents.

CMA CGM company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while PostNL company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither CMA CGM company nor PostNL company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

CMA CGM company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while PostNL company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither PostNL company nor CMA CGM company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PostNL nor CMA CGM holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CMA CGM company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PostNL company.

CMA CGM company employs more people globally than PostNL company, reflecting its scale as a Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage.

Neither PostNL nor CMA CGM holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PostNL nor CMA CGM holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PostNL nor CMA CGM holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PostNL nor CMA CGM holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PostNL nor CMA CGM holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PostNL nor CMA CGM holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H