Comparison Overview

Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.

VS

Wells Fargo Advisors

Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. also known as PSBC is a commercial retail bank founded in 2007 and headquartered in Beijing. It provides basic financial services, especially to small and medium enterprises, rural[1] and low income customers. As of December 31, 2017, PSBC has 39,798[2] branches covering all regions of China. PSBC was set up with an initial capital of RMB20 billion in 2007 from the State Post Bureau. Today it has RMB1.5 trillion in deposits and the second largest number of branches, after the Agricultural Bank of China. During the Global Financial Crisis, the government took several measures to spread its national economic stimulus plan specifically to rural areas. This included using microfinance services provided by the Postal Savings Bank as a tool for national development and poverty reduction. The bank with its extremely broad reach also assists China’s credit cooperatives in their microcredit schemes. On December 8, 2015, China Postal Savings Bank, through issuing pro-float stock, received an injection of investment from the Temasek Holdings of Singapore, UBS, the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, the International Finance Corporation, Morgan Stanley, DBS Bank, Tencent, Ant Financial Services Group, China Life and China Telecom, with a total investment of 45.1 billion yuan. These "strategic investors" together held a 16.92% stake in the company at the time of purchase. The stock was listed through an initial public offering on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong on September 30, 2016. Prior to its listing, it was the largest unlisted Chinese bank.[3] Xuewen Zhang and Hong Lao serve as Vice Presidents of the bank and co-executive directors.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Wells Fargo Advisors

1 North Jefferson Ave., None, St. Louis, Missouri, US, 63103
Last Update: 2025-11-26

With financial advisors serving our clients in all 50 states, Wells Fargo Advisors is headquartered in St. Louis. At the end of the day, we help our clients succeed financially. For us – our Financial Advisors and thousands of other team members – it's a commitment. It's about honoring our relationship with clients and being fully invested in their success. Investors’ needs are more complex now than at any time in history. There are the usual concerns that investors can plan for, but there are also those events when life happens. That’s why investors are increasingly looking for advice they can trust from a financial services firm which has experience and expertise, and an uncompromising dedication to its clients. Opinions and comments expressed by LinkedIn Members are those of the persons submitting them and do not necessarily represent our views. Additional guidelines can be found on wfa.com/social. Investment and Insurance Products are: * Not Insured by the FDIC or Any Federal Government Agency * Not a Deposit or Other Obligation of, or Guaranteed by, the Bank or Any Bank Affiliate * Subject to Investment Risks, Including Possible Loss of the Principal Amount Invested Wells Fargo recognizes and values the diversity of its employees, customers and business partners. EOE, M/F/D/V. Wells Fargo Advisors is a trade name used by Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC and Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network, LLC, Members SIPC, separate registered broker-dealers and non-bank affiliates of Wells Fargo & Company. © 2021 - 2025 Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC. All rights reserved. PM-09182026-6068127.2.1 Wells Fargo Investment Institute, Inc. (WFII) is a registered investment adviser and wholly-owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., a bank affiliate of Wells Fargo & Company.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 14,565
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/postal-savings-bank-of-china-co-ltd-,.jpeg
Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wells-fargo-advisors.jpeg
Wells Fargo Advisors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wells Fargo Advisors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wells Fargo Advisors in 2025.

Incident History — Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Wells Fargo Advisors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wells Fargo Advisors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/postal-savings-bank-of-china-co-ltd-,.jpeg
Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wells-fargo-advisors.jpeg
Wells Fargo Advisors
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent Disclosure
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Wells Fargo Advisors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Wells Fargo Advisors company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Wells Fargo Advisors company and Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Wells Fargo Advisors company nor Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Wells Fargo Advisors company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Wells Fargo Advisors company nor Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company nor Wells Fargo Advisors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. nor Wells Fargo Advisors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company nor Wells Fargo Advisors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Wells Fargo Advisors company employs more people globally than Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. nor Wells Fargo Advisors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. nor Wells Fargo Advisors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. nor Wells Fargo Advisors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. nor Wells Fargo Advisors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. nor Wells Fargo Advisors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Postal Savings Bank of China Co., Ltd. nor Wells Fargo Advisors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H