Comparison Overview

Portland Art Museum

VS

Indianapolis Zoo

Portland Art Museum

1219 SW Park Avenue, Portland, 97205, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Founded in late 1892, the Portland Art Museum is the seventh oldest museum in the United States and the oldest in the Pacific Northwest. The Museum is internationally recognized for its permanent collection and ambitious special exhibitions, drawn from the Museum’s holdings and the world’s finest public and private collections. The Museum’s collection of more than 42,000 objects, displayed in 112,000 square feet of galleries, reflects the history of art from ancient times to today. The collection is distinguished for its holdings of art of the native peoples of North America, English silver, and the graphic arts. An active collecting institution dedicated to preserving great art for the enrichment of future generations, the Museum devotes 90 percent of its gallery space to its permanent collection.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 212
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Indianapolis Zoo

1200 W. Washington Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46222, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Opened in 1964, the Indianapolis Zoo is the largest privately funded zoo in the nation. Located near downtown in White River State Park since 1988, the 93-acre Zoo was the first to be triple accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums and the American Alliance of Museums as a zoo, an aquarium and a botanic garden. Hosting more than a million visitors annually, the Zoo has also emerged as a global leader in animal conservation and research, receiving international recognition for work with conservation and breeding programs including the world’s first successful artificial insemination of an African elephant. Funding from the Indianapolis Zoo also supports the efforts of animal conservation organizations around the globe. At the Zoo, guests can connect year-round with nearly 1,300 animals within living habitats that closely resemble their native regions of the globe. The beautiful 3.3-acre White River Gardens is also part of the Zoo and continues its tradition of connecting animals, plants and people.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 374
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/portland-art-museum.jpeg
Portland Art Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indianapolis-zoological-society.jpeg
Indianapolis Zoo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Portland Art Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Indianapolis Zoo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Portland Art Museum in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indianapolis Zoo in 2025.

Incident History — Portland Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Portland Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Indianapolis Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indianapolis Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/portland-art-museum.jpeg
Portland Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indianapolis-zoological-society.jpeg
Indianapolis Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Indianapolis Zoo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Portland Art Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Indianapolis Zoo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Portland Art Museum company.

In the current year, Indianapolis Zoo company and Portland Art Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Indianapolis Zoo company nor Portland Art Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Indianapolis Zoo company nor Portland Art Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Indianapolis Zoo company nor Portland Art Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Portland Art Museum company nor Indianapolis Zoo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Portland Art Museum nor Indianapolis Zoo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Portland Art Museum company nor Indianapolis Zoo company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Indianapolis Zoo company employs more people globally than Portland Art Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Portland Art Museum nor Indianapolis Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Portland Art Museum nor Indianapolis Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Portland Art Museum nor Indianapolis Zoo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Portland Art Museum nor Indianapolis Zoo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Portland Art Museum nor Indianapolis Zoo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Portland Art Museum nor Indianapolis Zoo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X