Comparison Overview

Port Health

VS

One Senior Care

Port Health

1140 Westmont Dr, Houston, Texas, 77015, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Port Health is a comprehensive, full-service medical support solution helping international seafarers access health services virtually, on board and in port, ensuring crews stay on budget and on schedule any time or day of the year. Port Health is backed by Workplace Safety Screenings, one of Houston’s most trusted workplace health partners with over a decade of exceptional service. Our team of TWIC-certified licensed medical professionals allows us to offer fast, effective and comprehensive service with reliable quotes and consolidated billing. Multilingual health advocates are available to accompany your seafarer every step of the way, ensuring health issues are addressed promptly and correctly and your business stays on schedule, 24/7.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

One Senior Care

100 State Street, Suite 200, Erie, Pennsylvania, US, 16507
Last Update: 2025-11-21

One Senior Care is the nation’s leading PACE provider to rural and Appalachian communities. We have uniquely created reliable care that addresses several challenges faced by these communities. By bringing comprehensive healthcare services to underserved regions, we can help overcome barriers such as limited access to healthcare facilities, shortages of healthcare professionals, and transportation difficulties. Additionally, our program can alleviate the financial burdens associated with healthcare costs for seniors in these areas, ensuring they receive the necessary care without facing financial hardships. Through our community-based approach, we can also tackle social isolation and loneliness often experienced by seniors in rural settings, fostering a sense of belonging and providing much-needed social support. Together, we strive to eliminate healthcare disparities and improve the well-being of seniors in rural and Appalachian areas, ensuring they receive the care they deserve.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 54
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/port-health.jpeg
Port Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/one-senior-care.jpeg
One Senior Care
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Port Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
One Senior Care
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Port Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for One Senior Care in 2025.

Incident History — Port Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Port Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — One Senior Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)

One Senior Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/port-health.jpeg
Port Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/one-senior-care.jpeg
One Senior Care
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Port Health company and One Senior Care company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, One Senior Care company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Port Health company.

In the current year, One Senior Care company and Port Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither One Senior Care company nor Port Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither One Senior Care company nor Port Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither One Senior Care company nor Port Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Port Health company nor One Senior Care company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Port Health nor One Senior Care holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Port Health company nor One Senior Care company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

One Senior Care company employs more people globally than Port Health company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Port Health nor One Senior Care holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Port Health nor One Senior Care holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Port Health nor One Senior Care holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Port Health nor One Senior Care holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Port Health nor One Senior Care holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Port Health nor One Senior Care holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H