Comparison Overview

Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority

VS

Coral Springs Museum of Art

Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority

Port Arthur Historic Site, Arthur Highway, Port Arthur, Tasmania, AU, 7182
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Port Arthur Historic Site is a special place of vivid history, cultural heritage and stories so compelling, you’ll want to hear them again and again. It’s a place of global significance – one of the 11 places that make up the UNESCO World Heritage-listed Australian Convict Sites. And it’s one of Australia’s favourite tourist destinations. Cascades Female Factory Historic Site aims to foster a greater understanding and appreciation for the largely untold story of female convicts sent to Australia. Cascades Female Factory Historic Site is the most significant site associated with female convicts in Australia, it is listed as one of the 11 sites that together form the Australian Convict Sites World Heritage Property, inscribed on the World Heritage list in 2010. The Coal Mines Historic Site is an outstanding example of the 19th-century European global strategy of using the forced labour of convicts. Illustrating the importance of labour and production, classification, punishment and surveillance in the penal system and the role of the convict in the establishment of colonial economies, the Coal Mines Historic Site is listed as one of the 11 sites that together form the Australian Convict Sites World Heritage Property, inscribed on the World Heritage list in 2010.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 82
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Coral Springs Museum of Art

2855 Coral Springs Drive Suite A, Coral Springs, Florida, 33065, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Coral Springs Museum of Art is a museums and institutions company based out of 2855 Coral Springs Drive Suite A, Coral Springs, Florida, United States. What began late in 1996 as a City project to build a comprehensive recreation and community center, soon turned into The Coral Springs Center for the Arts – a performance theater and art museum. Housed in the impressive 30,000 square foot center for the arts building is the equally impressive Coral Springs Museum of Art which was incorporated in January of 1997. Our mission is to engage and connect our diverse communities with dynamic exhibits, exceptional art education, stimulating specialty programs and inspired events to ignite cultural enrichment.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/port-arthur-historic-site-management-authority.jpeg
Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coral-springs-museum-of-art.jpeg
Coral Springs Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Coral Springs Museum of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coral Springs Museum of Art in 2025.

Incident History — Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Coral Springs Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coral Springs Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/port-arthur-historic-site-management-authority.jpeg
Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coral-springs-museum-of-art.jpeg
Coral Springs Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Coral Springs Museum of Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Coral Springs Museum of Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company.

In the current year, Coral Springs Museum of Art company and Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Coral Springs Museum of Art company nor Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Coral Springs Museum of Art company nor Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Coral Springs Museum of Art company nor Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company nor Coral Springs Museum of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority nor Coral Springs Museum of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Coral Springs Museum of Art company.

Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company employs more people globally than Coral Springs Museum of Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority nor Coral Springs Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority nor Coral Springs Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority nor Coral Springs Museum of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority nor Coral Springs Museum of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority nor Coral Springs Museum of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority nor Coral Springs Museum of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X