Comparison Overview

Porsche Holding

VS

Truper

Porsche Holding

Louise-Piëch-Straße 2, None, Salzburg, Salzburg, AT, None
Last Update: 2025-12-25

Porsche Holding Salzburg is the largest and most successful automotive distributor in Europe. Our roots are in Salzburg, but we now also operate in 29 countries on three continents. Our core expertise: global automotive distribution. Our business divisions: automotive wholesale, automotive retail, financial services and IT systems. From a humble family business to one of the largest sales organizations in the world. Driven by our passion for the automobile since the company formation in 1947, Porsche Holding has grown from a family business into the leading mobility partner with dealerships and offices in 23 countries across Europe as well as in Chile, Colombia, China, Singapore, Malaysia, and Japan. Our corporate headquarters is still located where our company's rich history began, in the beautiful Austrian city of Salzburg. As a fully-owned subsidiary of Volkswagen AG, our business focuses on the VW Group brands Volkswagen Passenger Cars and Commercial Vehicles, Škoda, SEAT, CUPRA, Audi, Lamborghini, Bentley, Ducati and Porsche. We shape the future of mobility. Join the Porsche Holding team and be part of it.

NAICS: 42
NAICS Definition: Wholesale Trade
Employees: 10,183
Subsidiaries: 107
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Truper

Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 750 and 799

Somos la empresa más reconocida en Latinoamérica en manufactura, distribución y comercialización de herramientas y productos para todos los segmentos de la industria ferretera. Nuestro catálogo está en constante crecimiento, incluye más de 15,000 productos. El buen desempeño de estos está garantizado por el Centro de Calidad Avanzada TRUPER (CCAT), el laboratorio de calidad más avanzado del mundo en el sector ferretero. Contamos con 7 marcas especializadas por segmento: TRUPER, PRETUL,VOLTECK, FOSET, FIERO, Klintek, HERMEX

NAICS: 424
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/porsche-holding.jpeg
Porsche Holding
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/truper.jpeg
Truper
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Porsche Holding
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Truper
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Porsche Holding in 2025.

Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Truper in 2025.

Incident History — Porsche Holding (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Porsche Holding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Truper (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Truper cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/porsche-holding.jpeg
Porsche Holding
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/truper.jpeg
Truper
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Truper company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Porsche Holding company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Truper company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Porsche Holding company.

In the current year, Truper company and Porsche Holding company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Truper company nor Porsche Holding company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Truper company nor Porsche Holding company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Truper company nor Porsche Holding company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Porsche Holding company nor Truper company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Porsche Holding nor Truper holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Porsche Holding company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Truper company.

Porsche Holding company employs more people globally than Truper company, reflecting its scale as a Wholesale.

Neither Porsche Holding nor Truper holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Porsche Holding nor Truper holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Porsche Holding nor Truper holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Porsche Holding nor Truper holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Porsche Holding nor Truper holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Porsche Holding nor Truper holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in qs (parse modules) allows HTTP DoS.This issue affects qs: < 6.14.1. SummaryThe arrayLimit option in qs does not enforce limits for bracket notation (a[]=1&a[]=2), allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. Applications using arrayLimit for DoS protection are vulnerable. DetailsThe arrayLimit option only checks limits for indexed notation (a[0]=1&a[1]=2) but completely bypasses it for bracket notation (a[]=1&a[]=2). Vulnerable code (lib/parse.js:159-162): if (root === '[]' && options.parseArrays) { obj = utils.combine([], leaf); // No arrayLimit check } Working code (lib/parse.js:175): else if (index <= options.arrayLimit) { // Limit checked here obj = []; obj[index] = leaf; } The bracket notation handler at line 159 uses utils.combine([], leaf) without validating against options.arrayLimit, while indexed notation at line 175 checks index <= options.arrayLimit before creating arrays. PoCTest 1 - Basic bypass: npm install qs const qs = require('qs'); const result = qs.parse('a[]=1&a[]=2&a[]=3&a[]=4&a[]=5&a[]=6', { arrayLimit: 5 }); console.log(result.a.length); // Output: 6 (should be max 5) Test 2 - DoS demonstration: const qs = require('qs'); const attack = 'a[]=' + Array(10000).fill('x').join('&a[]='); const result = qs.parse(attack, { arrayLimit: 100 }); console.log(result.a.length); // Output: 10000 (should be max 100) Configuration: * arrayLimit: 5 (test 1) or arrayLimit: 100 (test 2) * Use bracket notation: a[]=value (not indexed a[0]=value) ImpactDenial of Service via memory exhaustion. Affects applications using qs.parse() with user-controlled input and arrayLimit for protection. Attack scenario: * Attacker sends HTTP request: GET /api/search?filters[]=x&filters[]=x&...&filters[]=x (100,000+ times) * Application parses with qs.parse(query, { arrayLimit: 100 }) * qs ignores limit, parses all 100,000 elements into array * Server memory exhausted → application crashes or becomes unresponsive * Service unavailable for all users Real-world impact: * Single malicious request can crash server * No authentication required * Easy to automate and scale * Affects any endpoint parsing query strings with bracket notation

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in code-projects Refugee Food Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /home/editfood.php. This manipulation of the argument a/b/c/d causes sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in code-projects Refugee Food Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /home/editrefugee.php. The manipulation of the argument rfid results in sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel vulnerability in Mobile Builder Mobile builder allows Authentication Abuse.This issue affects Mobile builder: from n/a through 1.4.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Hiroaki Miyashita Custom Field Template allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Custom Field Template: from n/a through 2.7.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L