Comparison Overview

Porchlight Health

VS

The Arc Alliance

Porchlight Health

2120 Alamosa Drive, Colorado Springs, CO, 80920, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Porchlight Health is a digital communication platform that helps healthcare providers reduce costs and improve outcomes. We succeed where telehealth, remote patient monitoring and other technology first solutions fail. Our unique combination of in-person support and technology gives healthcare providers, community resources, families, and payers the information and access they need to collaborate to support at-risk populations in their homes.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Arc Alliance

3075 Ridge Pike, None, Eagleville, PA, US, 19403
Last Update: 2025-11-25

The Arc Alliance provides supports to individuals with disabilities from birth throughout life across the Philadelphia suburban area. We provide Early Intervention Services, Supports Coordination Services, and Guardianship Services. Our team includes over 130 professionals who advocate for and support individuals with autism, intellectual, developmental, and other disabilities.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/porchlightapp.jpeg
Porchlight Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-arc-alliance.jpeg
The Arc Alliance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Porchlight Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Arc Alliance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Porchlight Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Arc Alliance in 2025.

Incident History — Porchlight Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Porchlight Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Arc Alliance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Arc Alliance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/porchlightapp.jpeg
Porchlight Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-arc-alliance.jpeg
The Arc Alliance
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Arc Alliance company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Porchlight Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Arc Alliance company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Porchlight Health company.

In the current year, The Arc Alliance company and Porchlight Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Arc Alliance company nor Porchlight Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Arc Alliance company nor Porchlight Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Arc Alliance company nor Porchlight Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Porchlight Health company nor The Arc Alliance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Porchlight Health nor The Arc Alliance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Porchlight Health company nor The Arc Alliance company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Arc Alliance company employs more people globally than Porchlight Health company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Porchlight Health nor The Arc Alliance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Porchlight Health nor The Arc Alliance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Porchlight Health nor The Arc Alliance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Porchlight Health nor The Arc Alliance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Porchlight Health nor The Arc Alliance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Porchlight Health nor The Arc Alliance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H