Comparison Overview

Popular Ink

VS

Run Direct

Popular Ink

2040 Redbud Blvd., Mckinney, Texas, 75070, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Popular Ink is a printer of flexible packaging materials, founded by Ray Salinas and Dru Riess. At Popular Ink, we are here to print popular products, build a brand, create a unique culture, and be consistent at our craft. We promise every impression we print will be treated as our first impression. We are invested in protecting our customer’s brand, by recognizing their success is directly proportional to our own.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Run Direct

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Run Direct is a full service print management company. We offer: * Commercial printing * Branded promotional products * Direct mail * Fulfillment * Distribution and Warehousing to clients across the United States, Mexico, and Europe. Our goal is not only to offer outstanding products, but to also provide you with exceptional service that helps alleviate some of the daily challenges faced when satisfying your print and fulfillment needs. Large or small, our company can service your organization's printing needs. From quarterly marketing campaigns, to in-store product displays, corporate collateral, and branded products all designed to increase your organization's exposure and market share. We go beyond just print production. Our fulfillment, distribution and warehousing capabilities have saved our clients time and money while providing efficiencies in working with a single source print management partner.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/run-direct.jpeg
Run Direct
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Popular Ink
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Run Direct
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Popular Ink in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Run Direct in 2025.

Incident History — Popular Ink (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Popular Ink cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Run Direct (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Run Direct cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/popular-ink.jpeg
Popular Ink
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/run-direct.jpeg
Run Direct
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Run Direct company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Popular Ink company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Run Direct company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Popular Ink company.

In the current year, Run Direct company and Popular Ink company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Run Direct company nor Popular Ink company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Run Direct company nor Popular Ink company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Run Direct company nor Popular Ink company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Popular Ink company nor Run Direct company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Popular Ink nor Run Direct holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Popular Ink company nor Run Direct company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Run Direct company employs more people globally than Popular Ink company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Popular Ink nor Run Direct holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Popular Ink nor Run Direct holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Popular Ink nor Run Direct holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Popular Ink nor Run Direct holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Popular Ink nor Run Direct holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Popular Ink nor Run Direct holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N