Comparison Overview

Polyprint

VS

SLB Printing, Inc.

Polyprint

Monastiriou 301, Thessaloniki, Greece, 54628, GR
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://polyprintdtg.com

Polyprint specializes in Direct-To-Garment printing technology. We help garment decorators in the Fashion, Promotional & Custom-Made Apparel industry to start a business and grow successfully with cost-efficient solutions and great customer support. We have been designing, developing and manufacturing DTG printers with the brand name TexJet® since 2006. Based in Greece with a subsidiary (Polyprint USA) in Charlotte, North Carolina, and a global network of official distributors, we serve customers in 50+ countries, delivering TexJet® DTG printers, pretreatment machines, inks, consumables, and accessories worldwide.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 73
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

SLB Printing, Inc.

2818 S. Robertson Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90034, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
https://www.slbprinting.com

SLB Printing Inc, established in 1984, provides "instant"​ digital printing as well as traditional offset printing, wide format printing and mail fulfillment services to a wide range of clients all across the United States. With over 35 years in business, SLB has the knowledge to make any printing and mailing job a sucess. With our new digital printing equipment, being environmentally aware with "green printing"​ abilities is easy! If you are looking for a printing company that you will be proud to call a "partner"​ in your business success try giving us a call.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/polyprintdtg.jpeg
Polyprint
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/slb-printing-inc-.jpeg
SLB Printing, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Polyprint
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SLB Printing, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Polyprint in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SLB Printing, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Polyprint (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Polyprint cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SLB Printing, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SLB Printing, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/polyprintdtg.jpeg
Polyprint
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/slb-printing-inc-.jpeg
SLB Printing, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Polyprint company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SLB Printing, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SLB Printing, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Polyprint company.

In the current year, SLB Printing, Inc. company and Polyprint company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SLB Printing, Inc. company nor Polyprint company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SLB Printing, Inc. company nor Polyprint company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SLB Printing, Inc. company nor Polyprint company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Polyprint company nor SLB Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Polyprint nor SLB Printing, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Polyprint company nor SLB Printing, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Polyprint company employs more people globally than SLB Printing, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Polyprint nor SLB Printing, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Polyprint nor SLB Printing, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Polyprint nor SLB Printing, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Polyprint nor SLB Printing, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Polyprint nor SLB Printing, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Polyprint nor SLB Printing, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References