Comparison Overview

Polyhistor International, Inc.

VS

Bridge Engineering Company

Polyhistor International, Inc.

11200 St Johns Industrial Pkwy N, Jacksonville, Florida, 32246, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

We are a Product Design, 3D printing, and CNC Machining company, bringing customers’ ideas to reality. Polyhistor uses a multitude of manufacturing methods in bringing products to market at a fast pace and at a low cost to our customers. Since the company’s inception in 1999, our customer base includes medical, defense, lighting, automotive, and consumer products. Polyhistor is a certified SolidWorks manufacturing partner, with full 3D design and manufacturing capabilities. In the forefront of design and development, we are always open to new opportunities and challenges. Do not hesitate to contact us to discuss your needs for product development and manufacturing. Custom products are mainstream products to us.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bridge Engineering Company

Behind Wazirabadi Octroi Post, Gujranwala, Punjab, 52290, PK
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Ibrahim Group was founded in 1992 has grown to be a leading producer/supplier of materials handling products like rollers/idlers and pulleys for heavy duty belt conveyors with profound/approved quality statistics including FEED Engineering to stamp a better yard in market. The Ibrahim Group's strengths include: Family owned company with more than 20 years experience in Manufacturing and marketing of components for Materials handling industries; More than 120 employees in 2 manufacturing companies and 3 sales points; Global approach with strong presence in Pakistan, Middle East; Significant investment in own R&D, technologies and quality systems; Largest range of rollers and pulleys of any supplier globally; Strategic focus on building up local service center to support your business;

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/polyhistor-international-inc-.jpeg
Polyhistor International, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bridge-engineering-company.jpeg
Bridge Engineering Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Polyhistor International, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bridge Engineering Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Polyhistor International, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bridge Engineering Company in 2025.

Incident History — Polyhistor International, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Polyhistor International, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bridge Engineering Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bridge Engineering Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/polyhistor-international-inc-.jpeg
Polyhistor International, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bridge-engineering-company.jpeg
Bridge Engineering Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bridge Engineering Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Polyhistor International, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bridge Engineering Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Polyhistor International, Inc. company.

In the current year, Bridge Engineering Company company and Polyhistor International, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bridge Engineering Company company nor Polyhistor International, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bridge Engineering Company company nor Polyhistor International, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bridge Engineering Company company nor Polyhistor International, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Polyhistor International, Inc. company nor Bridge Engineering Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Polyhistor International, Inc. nor Bridge Engineering Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Polyhistor International, Inc. company nor Bridge Engineering Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bridge Engineering Company company employs more people globally than Polyhistor International, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Polyhistor International, Inc. nor Bridge Engineering Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Polyhistor International, Inc. nor Bridge Engineering Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Polyhistor International, Inc. nor Bridge Engineering Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Polyhistor International, Inc. nor Bridge Engineering Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Polyhistor International, Inc. nor Bridge Engineering Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Polyhistor International, Inc. nor Bridge Engineering Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H