Comparison Overview

Polo Clinico di Psicologia

VS

Stonewall Institute Treatment Center

Polo Clinico di Psicologia

Strada dei Mercati, 16 a, Parma, 43126, IT
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Il Polo Clinico di Psicologia e Psicoterapia IDIPSI di Parma si pone come spazio di ascolto e di supporto psicologico a favore di tutte quelle persone, coppie o famiglie che stanno attraversando un momento di difficoltà e di disagio psicologico nella loro vita. Gli interventi che fornisce il Polo Clinico di Parma possono essere: • Consulenza e sostegno psicologico individuale, di coppia e familiare; • Terapia individuale, di coppia e familiare; • Attività di valutazione psicodiagnostica; • Consulenza psicologica alle realtà istituzionali presenti sul territorio (scuole, associazioni, Enti, aziende, ecc.) • Conduzione di gruppi Uno staff di psicologi-psicoterapeuti altamente qualificati è a disposizione per valutare la modalità d'intervento più appropriata.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Stonewall Institute Treatment Center

4020 N. 20th Street, Phoenix, Arizona, 85016, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20

Stonewall Institute Treatment Center located in Phoenix, Arizona is a licensed outpatient treatment center for co-occurring disorders, alcohol & drug dependence, and DUI services. We are dedicated to providing behavioral health services in a non-judging and affirmative environment. Stonewall Institute Treatment Center offers superior quality care in an upscale treatment setting at an affordable price. You’ll notice the difference when you work with us: - Personalized care with a low client-to-staff ratio - A holistic approach designed to help you heal all areas of your life - An upscale therapeutic environment that is both warm and professional - Exceptional results with positive client outcomes - Major insurance accepted - Economic hardship rates with financing options available We offer the following services at our central Phoenix location: Intensive Outpatient Treatment: - In just 10 weeks, our Intensive Outpatient Treatment program can help you establish a solid foundation for achieving and maintaining a meaningful life of sobriety. We will help you make purposeful life changes in a supportive setting. For just 3 nights a week, we help provide the structure, guidance, and support you need to develop the skills that can keep you on track. This life-long journey starts with the courage to face your vulnerabilities and embrace your potential. DUI Services - Price-Match Guarantee - Online & Onsite Availability - MVD/Alcohol Screenings - DUI Education (16 Hours) - DUI Treatment (36+ Hours) Clinical Evaluations - Our licensed therapists will conduct a thorough analysis of your circumstance and provide you with objective results related to your individual needs.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/polo-clinico-di-psicologia.jpeg
Polo Clinico di Psicologia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stonewall-institute.jpeg
Stonewall Institute Treatment Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Polo Clinico di Psicologia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stonewall Institute Treatment Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Polo Clinico di Psicologia in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stonewall Institute Treatment Center in 2026.

Incident History — Polo Clinico di Psicologia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Polo Clinico di Psicologia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stonewall Institute Treatment Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stonewall Institute Treatment Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/polo-clinico-di-psicologia.jpeg
Polo Clinico di Psicologia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stonewall-institute.jpeg
Stonewall Institute Treatment Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Stonewall Institute Treatment Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Polo Clinico di Psicologia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Stonewall Institute Treatment Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Polo Clinico di Psicologia company.

In the current year, Stonewall Institute Treatment Center company and Polo Clinico di Psicologia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stonewall Institute Treatment Center company nor Polo Clinico di Psicologia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stonewall Institute Treatment Center company nor Polo Clinico di Psicologia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stonewall Institute Treatment Center company nor Polo Clinico di Psicologia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Polo Clinico di Psicologia company nor Stonewall Institute Treatment Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Polo Clinico di Psicologia nor Stonewall Institute Treatment Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Polo Clinico di Psicologia company nor Stonewall Institute Treatment Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Stonewall Institute Treatment Center company employs more people globally than Polo Clinico di Psicologia company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Polo Clinico di Psicologia nor Stonewall Institute Treatment Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Polo Clinico di Psicologia nor Stonewall Institute Treatment Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Polo Clinico di Psicologia nor Stonewall Institute Treatment Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Polo Clinico di Psicologia nor Stonewall Institute Treatment Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Polo Clinico di Psicologia nor Stonewall Institute Treatment Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Polo Clinico di Psicologia nor Stonewall Institute Treatment Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N