Comparison Overview

Pollination Group

VS

Children's Helpers Worldwide

Pollination Group

2033 W. McDermott Dr., Allen, Tx, 75013-4675, US
Last Update: 2025-12-20
Between 750 and 799

We are fundraising visionaries who provide the strategy, creativity and execution our clients need to reach their full potential and explode with growth. We believe great development strategy and great impact come from building true relationships with donors, businesses, and the communities in which you invest. We help you execute your vision by coming alongside your organization to expand the reach and voice of your mission so that funding can be captured and your mission can bloom and flourish. We are fortified with a team of strategists and creative experts in the fields of Development Strategy, Fundraising Events, and Creative Communications. We are here to help you think through your toughest challenges, and execute a plan to fuel your mission and expand your impact. We are Pollination Group and we want to partner with you to make a difference and change lives. Please contact us today to find out more!

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Children's Helpers Worldwide

None
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Children’s Helpers Worldwide is a small organisation based in London. We are aiming to create a network for people around the world who want to help give children a better start to life. We work with the staff of local organisations, and have formed partnerships with people running projects in Argentina, China, Ghana, Romania and South Africa, so far. The local projects are very varied, and we work with schools, orphanages, hospitals, medical projects, sports programmes and more. We have supporters and volunteers from different countries around the world and look forward to more people getting involved

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pollination-group.jpeg
Pollination Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children's-helpers-worldwide.jpeg
Children's Helpers Worldwide
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pollination Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Children's Helpers Worldwide
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pollination Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Children's Helpers Worldwide in 2025.

Incident History — Pollination Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pollination Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Children's Helpers Worldwide (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Children's Helpers Worldwide cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pollination-group.jpeg
Pollination Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children's-helpers-worldwide.jpeg
Children's Helpers Worldwide
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Children's Helpers Worldwide company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pollination Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Children's Helpers Worldwide company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pollination Group company.

In the current year, Children's Helpers Worldwide company and Pollination Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Children's Helpers Worldwide company nor Pollination Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Children's Helpers Worldwide company nor Pollination Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Children's Helpers Worldwide company nor Pollination Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pollination Group company nor Children's Helpers Worldwide company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pollination Group nor Children's Helpers Worldwide holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pollination Group company nor Children's Helpers Worldwide company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pollination Group company employs more people globally than Children's Helpers Worldwide company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither Pollination Group nor Children's Helpers Worldwide holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pollination Group nor Children's Helpers Worldwide holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pollination Group nor Children's Helpers Worldwide holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pollination Group nor Children's Helpers Worldwide holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pollination Group nor Children's Helpers Worldwide holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pollination Group nor Children's Helpers Worldwide holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N