Comparison Overview

Policy Press

VS

Screen Africa

Policy Press

6th Floor, Howard House, Bristol, BS8 1SD, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Policy Press, an imprint of Bristol University Press, publishes scholarship that focuses on improving individual lives and reaches beyond academia to government, professionals and the wider public to inform policy and practice. We currently publish approximately 130 books and 8 journals a year. The Chief Executive is Alison Shaw. Policy Press has its roots in social policy and social justice, and is committed to progressive social change. Since its launch in 1996, we have built a reputation for publishing scholarship that focuses on improving individual lives and reaches beyond academia to government, professionals and the wider public, to inform policy and practice. Areas of interest include: • Social Policy • Social Work • Health Policy and Social Care • Education • Poverty

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Screen Africa

Cnr Montrose Avenue & Northumberland drive, Johannesburg, 2162, ZA
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Screen Africa's mission is to provide insightful and compelling information in its print and electronic publications about the South African professional entertainment industry, which comprises film, TV, commercials and new media production as well as events and professional equipment. We also cover film and television news from other countries in Africa. Our print magazine, website and e- mail newsletter strive for balanced coverage of creative, production and technological material. We feature practical, topical and credible content; news of productions, in-depth coverage of controversial industry issues; inspirational profiles; and informed examination of emerging and converging trends in content, distribution and equipment. Our quest is to provide an ongoing chemistry between readers and our publications.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/policy-press.jpeg
Policy Press
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Screen Africa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Policy Press
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Screen Africa
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Policy Press in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Screen Africa in 2025.

Incident History — Policy Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Policy Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Screen Africa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Screen Africa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/policy-press.jpeg
Policy Press
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Screen Africa
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Policy Press company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Screen Africa company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Screen Africa company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Policy Press company.

In the current year, Screen Africa company and Policy Press company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Screen Africa company nor Policy Press company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Screen Africa company nor Policy Press company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Screen Africa company nor Policy Press company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Policy Press company nor Screen Africa company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Policy Press nor Screen Africa holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Policy Press company nor Screen Africa company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Screen Africa company employs more people globally than Policy Press company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Policy Press nor Screen Africa holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Policy Press nor Screen Africa holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Policy Press nor Screen Africa holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Policy Press nor Screen Africa holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Policy Press nor Screen Africa holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Policy Press nor Screen Africa holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.