Comparison Overview

POLAR

VS

Lacivert Film LTD

POLAR

undefined, Detroit, Michigan, 48167, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

At POLAR, we’re all about telling real stories that capture the essence of our clients, and our clients’ clients. We’re passionate about being innovative and creative, and we pour that into creating visually striking and unforgettable content. We believe in the power of storytelling and we strive to bring our unique perspective to every project we take on.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lacivert Film LTD

Yeni Çarsi Caddesi, Beyoğlu, 34425, TR
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Lacivert Film is a company engendered to create unusual works of art for cinema, TV and other forms of media. İt is an association of people licensed in their respective fields and pursuing this creationary goal. The foundation of our organization are traceable back to the Concept Film company, which created unique productions for cinema and TV between the 1980s and the mid 1990s. One of the founding members of our association, Mr Atil Bey has established a second generation working order under the roof of Lacivert Film, by articulating the vocational knowledge, propriety, and philosophy that he learned in Concept Film to the necessities and dispositions of the changing world and the new media issues.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/polar-pictures.jpeg
POLAR
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lacivert-film-ltd.jpeg
Lacivert Film LTD
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
POLAR
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lacivert Film LTD
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for POLAR in 2025.

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lacivert Film LTD in 2025.

Incident History — POLAR (X = Date, Y = Severity)

POLAR cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lacivert Film LTD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lacivert Film LTD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/polar-pictures.jpeg
POLAR
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lacivert-film-ltd.jpeg
Lacivert Film LTD
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both POLAR company and Lacivert Film LTD company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Lacivert Film LTD company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to POLAR company.

In the current year, Lacivert Film LTD company and POLAR company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lacivert Film LTD company nor POLAR company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lacivert Film LTD company nor POLAR company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lacivert Film LTD company nor POLAR company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither POLAR company nor Lacivert Film LTD company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither POLAR nor Lacivert Film LTD holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither POLAR company nor Lacivert Film LTD company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

POLAR company employs more people globally than Lacivert Film LTD company, reflecting its scale as a Movies, Videos, and Sound.

Neither POLAR nor Lacivert Film LTD holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither POLAR nor Lacivert Film LTD holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither POLAR nor Lacivert Film LTD holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither POLAR nor Lacivert Film LTD holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither POLAR nor Lacivert Film LTD holds HIPAA certification.

Neither POLAR nor Lacivert Film LTD holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N