Comparison Overview

Pogo Linux, Inc.

VS

ImageTech Corporation

Pogo Linux, Inc.

906 Industry Drive, Tukwila, Washington, 98188, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.pogolinux.com

Founded in 1999, Pogo Linux is a robust provider of server and storage products that leads the industry in reliability and quality. Our product line is unique because it offers products for all levels of the IT infrastructure, from workstations to entry level servers to advanced storage solutions. By offering a broad base of products, and holding each one to the esteemed Pogo Linux standard of quality and reliability, the company is well-positioned to help a broad profile of customers.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

ImageTech Corporation

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
http://www.imagetechcorp.com/

ImageTech Corporation is a developer and manufacturer of Mobile Printing Solutions. Our patent pending technology focuses on solving printing demands of the new mobile computing era. In the new mobile computing landscape Tablets and Smartphones are replacing Desktops and Laptops. The company is committed to enabling mobile users to print “wherever they are” from their mobile devices to existing local printers. ImageTech’s printWiFi and printUSB mobile printing controllers are the failsafe method for mobile printing.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pogo-linux.jpeg
Pogo Linux, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
ImageTech Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pogo Linux, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ImageTech Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pogo Linux, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ImageTech Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — Pogo Linux, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pogo Linux, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ImageTech Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ImageTech Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pogo-linux.jpeg
Pogo Linux, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
ImageTech Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ImageTech Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pogo Linux, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ImageTech Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pogo Linux, Inc. company.

In the current year, ImageTech Corporation company and Pogo Linux, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ImageTech Corporation company nor Pogo Linux, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ImageTech Corporation company nor Pogo Linux, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ImageTech Corporation company nor Pogo Linux, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pogo Linux, Inc. company nor ImageTech Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pogo Linux, Inc. nor ImageTech Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pogo Linux, Inc. company nor ImageTech Corporation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pogo Linux, Inc. company employs more people globally than ImageTech Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither Pogo Linux, Inc. nor ImageTech Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pogo Linux, Inc. nor ImageTech Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pogo Linux, Inc. nor ImageTech Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pogo Linux, Inc. nor ImageTech Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pogo Linux, Inc. nor ImageTech Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pogo Linux, Inc. nor ImageTech Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References