Comparison Overview

PODER

VS

Chattycat

PODER

Calle Gonzales Prada 525, Lima, Lima, LIMA 34, PE
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

PODER es una revista de negocios, economía y política con ediciones en Estados Unidos, México, Venezuela, Colombia, Chile y Perú. Esta diversidad de fuentes y los acuerdos que mantenemos con instituciones como The Wharton School of Economics, The Economist o el IE Business School nos permiten, además de investigaciones e historias locales de primer nivel, brindar a nuestros lectores una mirada de lo que sucede en la región y el mundo. PODER Enterprise, la edición peruana de la revista, presenta informes en profundidad que han tenido gran impacto en otros medios e incluso se han convertido en temas de agenda pública.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Chattycat

10 rue de Penthievre, Paris, 75008, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Chattycat est une maison d'édition jeunesse française dont l'ambition est de faire découvrir aux enfants l'anglais et la culture anglo-saxonne. Nous publions des romans, des BD et des livres d'activités bilingues pour la jeunesse. Notre concept ? Des histoires pleines d’aventures, des textes qui passent naturellement d’une langue à l’autre. L’enfant se plonge dans une histoire intéressante et apprend l’anglais presque sans s’en rendre compte ! Nos livres accompagnent le jeune lecteur à chaque étape de son enfance. L’anglais, mais pas seulement : Nos romans proposent une découverte culturelle et historique du monde anglophone. Et chaque livre contient des petits bonus : jeux, activités, chronologies historiques, carnets de voyage… Et bien sûr, une version audio accompagne chaque livre ! En parallèle de notre activité d'édition, Chattycat intervient dans les écoles, organisant des ateliers périscolaires. Les enfants créent leurs propres histoires, en anglais, que nous éditons pour eux dans un livre imprimé à la fin de l'année. Ces ateliers sont également donnés dans différentes formes en bibliothèque, en librairie et en centre de loisirs.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/poder.jpeg
PODER
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chattycat.jpeg
Chattycat
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PODER
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chattycat
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PODER in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chattycat in 2025.

Incident History — PODER (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PODER cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chattycat (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chattycat cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/poder.jpeg
PODER
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chattycat.jpeg
Chattycat
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Chattycat company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PODER company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Chattycat company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PODER company.

In the current year, Chattycat company and PODER company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chattycat company nor PODER company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Chattycat company nor PODER company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Chattycat company nor PODER company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PODER company nor Chattycat company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PODER nor Chattycat holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PODER company nor Chattycat company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PODER company employs more people globally than Chattycat company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither PODER nor Chattycat holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PODER nor Chattycat holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PODER nor Chattycat holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PODER nor Chattycat holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PODER nor Chattycat holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PODER nor Chattycat holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.