Comparison Overview

PMP Limited

VS

Printing Association of Florida

PMP Limited

100 Harris St, Sydney, NSW, 2009, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pmplimited.com.au

On February 7, 2019, PMP rebranded to Ovato. PMP is recognised across Australasia as one of the largest print and distribution companies of catalogues, magazines and marketing materials. We also provide insights into your customers, shoot about 35,000 retail images a year and support the production of consistent multichannel communications through workflow and premedia solutions. Through our breadth of experience and expertise, PMP have developed a range of integrated marketing solutions to help you understand, reach and capture your customers’ attention. For further information visit www.pmplimited.com.au or call us on 1800 032 472.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 628
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Printing Association of Florida

5770 Hoffner Ave, Orlando, Florida, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
https://flprint.org/

PAF’s mission is to provide programs, information, and services to positively impact the profitability and professional growth of its members. We are committed to improving the business environment and promoting the welfare of members, as well as the entire graphic arts industry in Florida. We offer benefits and services to members, and help connect graphic arts consumers with companies that can meet their needs. We provide information to members concerning money-saving and money-making programs and services, as well as guidance on local and national legislative issues, the growing and confusing number of environmental and safety regulatory controls, educational initiatives, and more. To learn more about member services, call us at 407-240-8009 or 800-331-0461

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pmp-limited.jpeg
PMP Limited
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printing-association-of-florida.jpeg
Printing Association of Florida
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PMP Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Printing Association of Florida
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PMP Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Printing Association of Florida in 2025.

Incident History — PMP Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PMP Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Printing Association of Florida (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Printing Association of Florida cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pmp-limited.jpeg
PMP Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printing-association-of-florida.jpeg
Printing Association of Florida
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PMP Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Printing Association of Florida company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Printing Association of Florida company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PMP Limited company.

In the current year, Printing Association of Florida company and PMP Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Printing Association of Florida company nor PMP Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Printing Association of Florida company nor PMP Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Printing Association of Florida company nor PMP Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PMP Limited company nor Printing Association of Florida company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PMP Limited nor Printing Association of Florida holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PMP Limited company nor Printing Association of Florida company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PMP Limited company employs more people globally than Printing Association of Florida company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither PMP Limited nor Printing Association of Florida holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PMP Limited nor Printing Association of Florida holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PMP Limited nor Printing Association of Florida holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PMP Limited nor Printing Association of Florida holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PMP Limited nor Printing Association of Florida holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PMP Limited nor Printing Association of Florida holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References