Comparison Overview

Plevin & Gallucci

VS

Covington Brussels

Plevin & Gallucci

55 Public Square, Cleveland, Ohio, 44113, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Plevin and Gallucci is an experienced Cleveland and Columbus based law firm handling personal injury, workers compensation and medical malpractice law cases. Since Frank Galluccii III and Leon M. Plevin founded the firm in 1971 out of an italian import store warehouse in Cleveland, Ohio, a superior work ethic and drive for unparalleled client service has followed. The knowledge and expertise that the firm brings to your case will exceed all expectations.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Covington Brussels

Bolwerklaan 21 Avenue du Boulevard , Brussels , Brussels, BE, B-1210
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

With over 1,300 lawyers in offices around the world, Covington delivers global insight and advice to clients on their most challenging deals and disputes. Our Brussels office brings together experts from more than 11 different countries. Our particular focus lies in highly-regulated sectors such as technology, media and communications, life sciences, energy, and environment. The team draws on the diverse expertise and experience of our lawyers and advisors to help clients navigate their most complex challenges, deals, and disputes, particularly in relation to the application of competition, regulatory, and privacy and data security law, and policy and public affairs issues.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/plevin-&-gallucci.jpeg
Plevin & Gallucci
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/covington-&-burling-llp---belgium.jpeg
Covington Brussels
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Plevin & Gallucci
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Covington Brussels
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Plevin & Gallucci in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Covington Brussels in 2025.

Incident History — Plevin & Gallucci (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Plevin & Gallucci cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Covington Brussels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Covington Brussels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/plevin-&-gallucci.jpeg
Plevin & Gallucci
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/covington-&-burling-llp---belgium.jpeg
Covington Brussels
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Plevin & Gallucci company and Covington Brussels company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Covington Brussels company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Plevin & Gallucci company has not reported any.

In the current year, Covington Brussels company and Plevin & Gallucci company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Covington Brussels company nor Plevin & Gallucci company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Covington Brussels company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Plevin & Gallucci company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Covington Brussels company nor Plevin & Gallucci company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Plevin & Gallucci company nor Covington Brussels company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Plevin & Gallucci nor Covington Brussels holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Covington Brussels company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Plevin & Gallucci company.

Neither Plevin & Gallucci nor Covington Brussels holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Plevin & Gallucci nor Covington Brussels holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Plevin & Gallucci nor Covington Brussels holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Plevin & Gallucci nor Covington Brussels holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Plevin & Gallucci nor Covington Brussels holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Plevin & Gallucci nor Covington Brussels holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X